Hello, some time ago we had some discussion going on because of instabilities when using SSL I don't think that's fixed yet, that is why I personally would vote [-1] also without being a developer.
Artur Neumann, INF/N IT Projects International Nepal Fellowship Web: http://www.inf.org Skype: artur.n. Am 09.12.2013 20:31, schrieb Michael Wuttke: > Hello Maxim, > > My vote is +1, even if I not am a developer of OM. ;-) > > Greetings, > Michael > > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Betreff: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.2.0 Release Candidate 1 > Datum: Sun, 08 Dec 2013 18:03:18 GMT > Von: Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> > > [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.2.0 Release Candidate 1 > > Dear OpenMeetings Community, > > I would like to start a vote about releasing Apache OpenMeetings 2.2.0 RC1 > > Main changes are covered in the > Readme: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.2.0RC1/README > > Full Changelog: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.2.0RC1/CHANGELOG > > Release artefacts: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openmeetings/2.2.0/rc1/ > > Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.2.0RC1/ > > PGP release keys (signed using > C467526E):https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openmeetings/2.2.0/rc1/KEYS > > Vote will be open for 72 hours. > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > My vote is +1. >
