2.x is NOT HTML4 it is swf (Adobe flash) both 2.2 and 3.0 have the same code for the room
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Varga Balázs <join...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Developments! > > I don't know, what the different a OM 2.1.1 and 3.0.0 (3.0.1) in > conference core side. > > The 2.1.x is HTML4 , good backward compatibility, a 3.0.0 is HTML5, this > features request only the portal functions and core is none. > > I am a OM service provider and use only room functions on REST calls, > portal never use. > My participants very incompatibile browsers (many user from world) > probally conferencing hier. > > The OM core is many bugfix and features presents the prev 1 year, and this > bugfixs is more in OM 3.0. > > The 2.1.1 version is better browser compatibility, the conference core 2 > or 3 better stabile working? > > The 2.1.1 is many broken connection in room session, whenn connection > lost, the user is drop out login page or portal inside room management. > Problem: My system full REST app, the user never see portal... all > functions, calls work in backend and silent, the user parse all from my > portal. > The om 3.0 stabiliti better than 2.1 in my test sessions. > > > Or the 2vs3 core equivalent? > Howto mix OM 3.0.0 conference room core (db, swf-s...etc) the oldest HTML? > > Balazs Varga > http://server6.**magyarwebkonferencia.hu:5080/**openmeetings<http://server6.magyarwebkonferencia.hu:5080/openmeetings> > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
