All 2.1 nightly builds are here
https://builds.apache.org/job/Openmeetings%202.1/
All 3.0 are here: https://builds.apache.org/job/Openmeetings
RC are here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openmeetings/2.1/

3.0 should start as expected after next nightly build (the issue in red5 is
fixed)


On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Clem <clemf...@free.fr> wrote:

> Ok great, in fact I was in openmeetings directory on jenkins, and I didn’t
> see the build was 3.0.0, so I update as usual, and OM didn’t start, after I
> realized that wasn’t the 2.1 anymore ! 3.0 and 2.1 build are mixed, I
> assume “openmeetings” dir is for all versions.****
>
> ** **
>
> HTML5 oriented is now indispensable, I think, to be compatible with all
> platforms, I’ll follow your work with interest !****
>
> ** **
>
> After reading some mails there, there’s a new dir for 2.1 builds, so I
> focus there now, RC3 will be there too ?!****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks,****
>
> ** **
>
> Clem****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *De :* Maxim Solodovnik [mailto:solomax...@gmail.com]
> *Envoyé :* vendredi 22 mars 2013 14:03
> *À :* Openmeetings user-list
> *Objet :* Re: questions about 3.0.0****
>
> ** **
>
> Hello Clem,****
>
> ** **
>
> today I'll pack 2.1RC3****
>
> ** **
>
> 3.0 will be HTML5 oriented, we will going to try to get rid of Flash (most
> of it)****
>
> No differences in update process ... same steps****
>
> ** **
>
> I would recommend to stay on 2.1, since 3.0 is in pre-alpha stage (only
> Calendar  and Admin works so far) :)****
>
> ** **
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Clem <clemf...@free.fr> wrote:****
>
> Hello,****
>
>  ****
>
> Can you tell me if I have to update my openmeetings 2.1 with last build of
> this https://builds.apache.org/job/Openmeetings%202.1/ ,or If I have to
> compile the new 3.0.0 ? What is the main differences between these two
> versions ?****
>
>  ****
>
> Which is the more stable and powerfull ? Is there a tutorial for install
> the 3.0.0 ?****
>
>  ****
>
> Thanks****
>
>  ****
>
> Clem****
>
>  ****
>
>
>
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax ****
>



-- 
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

Reply via email to