Thanks Sebastian, but I have to provide a practicable scenario, anticipating The demand. In the primary use each room will have only 2 participants with audio, video , whiteboard and chat. The video can be 240x180 (40 Kb/s) or audio + video = 70Kb/s. With this information I calculate traffic sent into the server: 2 * 70Kb/s = 140Kb/s and server traffic sent out: 2 * (2-1) * 70Kb/s = 140Kb/s (I only need it). So every room of this example uses only 140K/ s of bandwidth server.
Making a simple division it says, in theory, than with a server bandwidth of 100Mb/s I can have up to 726 people simultaneously connected in 363 rooms (2 people per room in this example). This forecast shall is correct? Thanks again! 2013/3/8 seba.wag...@gmail.com <seba.wag...@gmail.com> > Hallo Jaime, > > I would probably not look at the CPU/memory consumption as the main > limiting factor is the bandwidth. > > To calculate exact numbers of the bandwidth you need to know: > 1) What is the main use-case scenario (1:1 meeting or 1:10 meetings) > 2) How many of the participants broadcast and how many of them view the > stream > 3) What video resolution will the users use for the conference > > (screensharing session won't be included in this scenario) > > Based on that you can calculate the bandwidth needs per conference room, > and then calc for example the bandwidth need for the lets say 10, 20, 50 > and 100 conference rooms. > > So its correct: Depending on the use-case you can have very different > numbers. > > Sebastian > > > 2013/3/8 Jaime Balbino <jaimeb...@gmail.com> > >> Hello, >> I have a question very common on this list, but that does not have a generic >> answer and replicability. >> I am needing to know for sure how many people can I have simultaneously an >> installation of OpenMeetings (4x Core/8Gb RAM and bandwidth 100 Mb/s). >> The standard situation is as follows: many rooms with 2 participants >> face-to-face and witheboard. >> How many rooms and people support these configuration simultaneously? >> Using calculations already posted here came to very different numbers >> among only 30 people until 1000 (!). >> >> Thanks! >> > > > > -- > Sebastian Wagner > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > http://www.webbase-design.de > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com > seba.wag...@gmail.com >