Just built an external app using sbt against the staging repo and it looks good to me
+1 (binding) On Apr 11, 2015, at 9:12 AM, Andrew Palumbo <[email protected]> wrote: After testing examples locally from .tar and .zip distribution and testing the staged mahout-math artifact in a java application, I am happy with this release. +1 (binding) On 04/11/2015 11:45 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote: > After checking the {source} * {tar,zip} and running a few tests locally, I > am fine with this release. > > +1 (binding) > > On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Andrew Musselman < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> After checking the binary tarball and zip, and running through all the >> examples on an EMR cluster, I am good with this release. >> >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Ah... forgot this. >>> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I downloaded and tested the signatures and check-sums on >> {binary,source} >>> x >>>> {zip,tar} + pom. All were correct. >>>> >>>> One thing that I worry a little about is that the name of the artifact >>>> doesn't include "apache". Not sure that is a hard requirement, but it >>>> seems a good thing to do. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Suneel Marthi < >> [email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Here's a new Mahout 0.10.0 Release Candidate at >>>>> >>>>> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1007/ >>>>> The Voting for this ends on tomorrow. Need atleast 3 PMC +1 for the >>>>> release to pass. >>>>> >>>>> Grant, Ted: Would appreciate if u guys could verify the signatures. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Rest: Please test the artifacts. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks to all the contributors and committers. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Suneel >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Pat Ferrel <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Ran well but we have a packaging problem with the binary distro. >> Will >>>>>> require either a pom or code change I think, hold the vote. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Apr 9, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Andrew Musselman < >>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Running on EMR now. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Pat Ferrel <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> I can't run it (due to messed up dev machine) but I verified the >>>>>> artifacts >>>>>>> buildiing an external app with sbt using the staged repo instead >> of >>> my >>>>>>> local .m2 cache. This means the Scala classes were resolved >>> correctly >>>>>> from >>>>>>> the artifacts. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hope someone can actually run it on a cluster >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Suneel Marthi < >> [email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at >>>>>>> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/ >>>>>>> The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast 3 PMC >> +1 >>>>> votes >>>>>>> for the candidate release to pass. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their hard >>> work >>>>>> over >>>>>>> the past few weeks. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> Suneel >>>>>>> On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>
