it's a  bug. There's a number of similar ones in operator A'B.

On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 6:23 AM, Michael Kelly <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Pat,
>
> I've done some further digging and it looks like the problem is
> occurring when the input files are split up to into parts. The input
> to the item-similarity matrix is the output from a spark job and it
> ends up in about 2000 parts (on the hadoop file system). I have
> reproduced the error locally using a small subset of the rows.
>
> This is a snippet of the file I am using -
>
> ...
>
> 5138353282348067470,1891081885
> 4417954190713934181,1828065687
> 133682221673920382,1454844406
> 133682221673920382,1129053737
> 133682221673920382,548627241
> 133682221673920382,1048452021
> 8547417492653230933,1121310481
> 7693904559640861382,1333374361
> 7204049418352603234,606209305
> 139299176617553863,467181330
> ...
>
>
> When I run the item-similarity against a single input file which
> contains all the rows, the job succeeds without error.
>
> When I break up the input file into 100 parts, and use the directory
> containing them as input then I get the 'Index outside allowable
> range' exception.
>
> Her are the input files that I used tarred and gzipped -
>
>
> https://s3.amazonaws.com/static.onespot.com/mahout/passing_single_file.tar.gz
>
> https://s3.amazonaws.com/static.onespot.com/mahout/failing_split_into_100_parts.tar.gz
>
> There are 44067 rows in total, 11858 unique userIds and 24166 unique
> itemIds.
>
> This is the exception that I see on the 100 part run -
> 15/04/03 12:07:09 ERROR Executor: Exception in task 0.0 in stage 9.0 (TID
> 707)
> org.apache.mahout.math.IndexException: Index 24190 is outside
> allowable range of [0,24166)
> at org.apache.mahout.math.AbstractVector.viewPart(AbstractVector.java:147)
> at org.apache.mahout.math.scalabindings.VectorOps.apply(VectorOps.scala:37)
> at
> org.apache.mahout.sparkbindings.blas.AtA$$anonfun$5$$anonfun$apply$6.apply(AtA.scala:152)
> at
> org.apache.mahout.sparkbindings.blas.AtA$$anonfun$5$$anonfun$apply$6.apply(AtA.scala:149)
> at scala.collection.immutable.Stream$$anonfun$map$1.apply(Stream.scala:376)
> at scala.collection.immutable.Stream$$anonfun$map$1.apply(Stream.scala:376)
> at scala.collection.immutable.Stream$Cons.tail(Stream.scala:1085)
> at scala.collection.immutable.Stream$Cons.tail(Stream.scala:1077)
> at
> scala.collection.immutable.StreamIterator$$anonfun$next$1.apply(Stream.scala:980)
> at
> scala.collection.immutable.StreamIterator$$anonfun$next$1.apply(Stream.scala:980)
> at
> scala.collection.immutable.StreamIterator$LazyCell.v$lzycompute(Stream.scala:969)
> at scala.collection.immutable.StreamIterator$LazyCell.v(Stream.scala:969)
> at scala.collection.immutable.StreamIterator.hasNext(Stream.scala:974)
> at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$13.hasNext(Iterator.scala:371)
> at
> org.apache.spark.util.collection.ExternalSorter.insertAll(ExternalSorter.scala:202)
> at
> org.apache.spark.shuffle.sort.SortShuffleWriter.write(SortShuffleWriter.scala:56)
> at
> org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:68)
> at
> org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:41)
> at org.apache.spark.scheduler.Task.run(Task.scala:56)
> at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.run(Executor.scala:200)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
>
>
> I tried splitting the file up in 10,20 and 50 parts and the job completed.
> Also, should the resulting similarity matrix be the same wether the
> input is split up or not? I passed in the same random seed for the
> spark job, but the matrices were different
>
> Thanks,
>
> Michael
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Pat Ferrel <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The input must be tuples (if not using a filter) so the CLI you have
> expects user and item ids that are
> >
> > user-id1,item-id1
> > user-id500,item-id3000
> > …
> >
> > The ids must be tokenized because it doesn’t use a full csv parser, only
> lines of delimited text.
> >
> > If this doesn’t help can you supply a snippet of the input
> >
> >
> > On Apr 2, 2015, at 10:39 AM, Michael Kelly <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm running the spark-itemsimilarity job from the cli on an AWS emr
> > cluster, and I'm running into an exception.
> >
> > The input file format is
> > UserId<tab>ItemId1<tab>ItemId2<tab>ItemId3......
> >
> > There is only one row per user, and a total of 97,000 rows.
> >
> > I also tried input with one row per UserId/ItemId pair, which had
> > about 250,000 rows, but I also saw a similar exception, this time the
> > out of bounds index was around 110,000.
> >
> > The input is stored in hdfs and this is the command I used to start the
> job -
> >
> > mahout spark-itemsimilarity --input userItems --output output --master
> > yarn-client
> >
> > Any idea what the problem might be?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Michael
> >
> >
> >
> > 15/04/02 16:37:40 WARN TaskSetManager: Lost task 1.0 in stage 10.0
> > (TID 7631, ip-XX.XX.ec2.internal):
> > org.apache.mahout.math.IndexException: Index 22050 is outside
> > allowable range of [0,21997)
> >
> >
> org.apache.mahout.math.AbstractVector.viewPart(AbstractVector.java:147)
> >
> >
> org.apache.mahout.math.scalabindings.VectorOps.apply(VectorOps.scala:37)
> >
> >
> org.apache.mahout.sparkbindings.blas.AtA$$anonfun$5$$anonfun$apply$6.apply(AtA.scala:152)
> >
> >
> org.apache.mahout.sparkbindings.blas.AtA$$anonfun$5$$anonfun$apply$6.apply(AtA.scala:149)
> >
> >
> scala.collection.immutable.Stream$$anonfun$map$1.apply(Stream.scala:376)
> >
> >
> scala.collection.immutable.Stream$$anonfun$map$1.apply(Stream.scala:376)
> >
> >        scala.collection.immutable.Stream$Cons.tail(Stream.scala:1085)
> >
> >        scala.collection.immutable.Stream$Cons.tail(Stream.scala:1077)
> >
> >
> scala.collection.immutable.StreamIterator$$anonfun$next$1.apply(Stream.scala:980)
> >
> >
> scala.collection.immutable.StreamIterator$$anonfun$next$1.apply(Stream.scala:980)
> >
> >
> scala.collection.immutable.StreamIterator$LazyCell.v$lzycompute(Stream.scala:969)
> >
> >
> scala.collection.immutable.StreamIterator$LazyCell.v(Stream.scala:969)
> >
> >
> scala.collection.immutable.StreamIterator.hasNext(Stream.scala:974)
> >
> >        scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$13.hasNext(Iterator.scala:371)
> >
> >
> org.apache.spark.util.collection.ExternalAppendOnlyMap.insertAll(ExternalAppendOnlyMap.scala:144)
> >
> >
> org.apache.spark.Aggregator.combineValuesByKey(Aggregator.scala:58)
> >
> >
> org.apache.spark.shuffle.hash.HashShuffleWriter.write(HashShuffleWriter.scala:55)
> >
> >
> org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:68)
> >
> >
> org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:41)
> >
> >        org.apache.spark.scheduler.Task.run(Task.scala:54)
> >
> >
> org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.run(Executor.scala:177)
> >
> >
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
> >
> >
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
> >
> >        java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> >
>

Reply via email to