The algorithm never made it to the codebase and remained a patch for sometime when the original author recalled the patch while we were working on 0.8. It wasn't scalable and the author didn't think it was worth committing to trunk.
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 2:34 AM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: > The algorithm wasn't particularly scalable. Nobody was around to support > it. Nobody complained about the many warnings that it would be removed, > nor the deprecation. Nor even the removal. > > > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 1:20 AM, [email protected] <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Can anyone tell me why the Restricted Boltzmann Machines algorithm was > > removed ? > > > > > > >
