Thanks, Stuti.

ok, i think there's something  indeed going on with PCA stuff. it may
require a patch.

-d


On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 2:12 AM, Stuti Awasthi <[email protected]> wrote:

> I have not used -q option while running ssvd. Here are the commands which
> I run :
>
> Seq2sparse :
> mahout-distribution-0.7/bin/mahout seq2sparse -i /stuti/SSVD/data-seq -o
> /stuti/SSVD/data-vectors -s 5 -ml 50 -nv -ng 3 -n 2 -x 70
>
> SSVD
> hadoop jar mahout-distribution-0.7/mahout-core-0.8-job.jar
> org.apache.mahout.math.hadoop.stochasticsvd.SSVDCli -i
> /stuti/SSVD/data-vectors/tf-vectors -o /stuti/SSVD/Output -k 90 -U true -V
> true --reduceTasks 1
>
> Thanks
> Stuti Awasthi
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dmitriy Lyubimov [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 2:14 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: How to SSVD output to generate Clusters
>
> Thanks Stuti. Yes it looks like it is not there. Let me run a test. One
> question . Did you use -q 0 or 1 or sometni g elw   se?
> On Aug 7, 2013 12:18 AM, "Stuti Awasthi" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hey Dmitriy,
> >
> > Sorry for replying late.
> > I have re-run the steps to generate U. Here are the output:
> >
> > 1. "seq2sparse" Output: Contains Named Vector
> > Key: /Description_10: Value:
> > /Description_10:{554:1.0,54:1.0,514:1.0,322:1.0,247:1.0,91:1.0,127:1.0
> > ,456:1.0,480:1.0,713:1.0,674:1.0,117:1.0,461:1.0,595:2.0,446:1.0,296:2
> > .0}
> >
> > 2. "ssvd" Output of U: Not Contained NamedVector
> > Key: /Description_10: Value:
> >
> {0:0.010564205396743468,1:-0.01989403962804719,2:0.015640314765729225,3:0.04031717183780774,4:-0.03325995251075869,5:0.0294201152018514,6:
> >
> > 0.03834130611889856,7:-0.008686421005328312,8:-0.06164515883823538,9:0
> > .03752875772953153,10:0.04739786931946798,11:-0.07912744917669134,12:0
> > .020078421275704143,13:-0.0
> >
> > 4017504785907734,14:0.012539132502559502,15:0.0733073647645918,16:-0.0
> > 2111033727307056,17:0.0799478317610193,18:-0.08481960414593219,19:-0.0
> > 6987848875856222,20:0.03693
> >
> > 2920091059446,21:-0.06949180571421532,22:-0.03447267994522256,23:-0.07
> > 104196347181493,24:0.022262180555421562,25:-0.0485632586340187,26:-0.0
> > 5380823388650383,27:0.09299
> >
> > 533887785207,28:0.0019344239524856396,29:0.002936116541403362,30:-0.07
> > 249587007236825,31:0.0016026176038041033,32:-0.0711115256224166,33:0.0
> > 6603931206284432,34:0.01922
> >
> > 6806201249697,35:0.13972781245330326,36:0.0787696939450401,37:0.070653
> > 56340476747,38:0.08437107545490818,39:0.06381670380272558,40:0.0464059
> > 64753673735,41:0.0601332388
> >
> > 594578,42:-0.12996454299711707,43:0.10779361589915878,44:-0.0652470275
> > 4474347,45:0.014785171162887613,46:-0.036630574690084586,47:-0.1506665
> > 6149902793,48:0.16190482591
> > 405958,49:-0.00869851116149916}
> >
> > As you said that propagation of keys to keys or/and names to names
> > should happen . Any idea what's going wrong or if there is a mistake
> from my side ?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Stuti Awasthi
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dmitriy Lyubimov [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 11:39 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: How to SSVD output to generate Clusters
> >
> > by eyeballing the code, i think i don' t see a problem. if rows of A
> > are named values, then row of U (or U*Sigma or U*Sigma^1/2) would also
> > retain names from values of rows of A. Output would not contain
> > NamedVector values for rows that were not NamedVector values
> > themselves in the input. Does seq2sparse output create NamedVectors as
> values ?
> >
> > Note that if what you want is to have *keys* from from seq2sparse
> > (such as
> > 'file_1') propagated to name of named vector value in U, that much is
> > not happening. The algorithm propagates keys to keys or/and names to
> > names (but not any other combinations of those).
> >
> > -d
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > it should. i worked on the issue and last time it was checked it was
> > > still working with name propagation. if not, then it is a bug
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Stuti Awasthi <[email protected]
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hey Ted,
> > >>
> > >> As suggested, I tried SSVD with Mahout 0.8. I think the issue of
> > >> NamedVector not propagating to the output U ,still persists.
> > >> Here is what I have done :
> > >>
> > >> 1. Created featureVector using "seq2sparse" with -nv option.
> > >> Checked the output, named vector created.
> > >> 2. Provided this featureVector to "ssvd" with params " -k 100 -U
> > >> true -V true". After execution, 3 output got generated namely :
> > >> sigma, U, V 3. I dumped "U" to check the output if it contained
> namedVectors:
> > >>
> > >> mahout-distribution-0.7/bin/mahout seqdumper -i
> > >> /stuti/SSVD/Output/U
> > >> | more
> > >> Output:
> > >> Key: /File_1: Value:
> > >> {0:0.027019746696983288,1:0.006124424321845726,2:0.0334311500858222,.
> > >> ....}
> > >>
> > >> I did not see the NamedVector getting created in the output of ssvd.
> > >> Please point out if I have missed any step in between.
> > >>
> > >> As I wanted to perform the Clustering, I took the output of "U" and
> > >> generated the NamedVector with custom code. The output looks like
> this :
> > >> Key: /File_1: Value:
> > >> /File_1:{0:0.027019746696983288,1:0.006124424321845726,2:0.03343115
> > >> 00
> > >> 858222,.....}
> > >>
> > >> Then I fed this namedvector file to KMeans to generate 10 Clusters.
> > >> In this I have used Random Centroid selection with KMeans.
> > >> Finally I dumped the ClusterOutput as :
> > >> <ClusterId>,<DocumentID1>,<DocumentId2>.....
> > >>
> > >> Please let me know if I have performed any mistake in the end to
> > >> end execution as well Im not sure Why SSVD output is not generating
> > >> the named vectors as the issue id fixed..
> > >>
> > >> Please suggest
> > >>
> > >> Regards
> > >> Stuti Awasthi
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Ted Dunning [mailto:[email protected]]
> > >> Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 8:37 PM
> > >> To: [email protected]
> > >> Subject: Re: How to SSVD output to generate Clusters
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Stuti Awasthi
> > >> <[email protected]>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > I think there is a problem because of NamedVector as after some
> > >> > search I get this Jira.
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1067
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> Note also that this bug is fixed in 0.8
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ::DISCLAIMER::
> > >>
> > >> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> --
> > >> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> --
> > >> ----------
> > >>
> > >> The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential
> > >> and intended for the named recipient(s) only.
> > >> E-mail transmission is not guaranteed to be secure or error-free as
> > >> information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed,
> > >> arrive late or incomplete, or may contain viruses in transmission.
> > >> The e mail and its contents (with or without referred errors) shall
> > >> therefore not attach any liability on the originator or HCL or its
> > >> affiliates.
> > >> Views or opinions, if any, presented in this email are solely those
> > >> of the author and may not necessarily reflect the views or opinions
> > >> of HCL or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, dissemination,
> > >> copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or
> > >> publication of this message without the prior written consent of
> > >> authorized representative of HCL is strictly prohibited. If you
> > >> have received this email in error please delete it and notify the
> > >> sender immediately.
> > >> Before opening any email and/or attachments, please check them for
> > >> viruses and other defects.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> --
> > >> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> --
> > >> ----------
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to