On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 11:12 PM Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez < juanpablo.san...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In any case, going to JDK-17 and requiring a new major version of > Tomcat, or whichever, would be a stronger reason to name it 3.0. I > remember the attempt at 3.0, but given the amount of time that has > passed I think it would be ok to stick with it. At least, I'd find > weird the change from 2.12 to 4.0 out of the blue. For a breaking change (or two), the major version should definitely be increased IMO. I second that 4.0 might be confusing, as there never was a 3.0. Looking at the Jira, there are a number of tickets scheduled for 3.0 that seem to be rather old and not actively being worked on AFAICT. Maybe some of those should be moved to 3.1 in order to get 3.0 out the door?
