Hi team, I would like to follow up on this question I had about Lucene integration in Ignite 3.0
To quickly recap: We’re working on a .NET-based application that requires fuzzy full-text search on in-memory data across millions of records. Ignite 2.x’s Lucene integration was a strong fit for this, but we’ve noticed the functionality is no longer present in Ignite 3.x. Specifically, I’d appreciate any insight on: - Whether Lucene or fuzzy search support is planned in future Ignite 3.x releases. - Any recommended patterns for integrating Lucene.NET (or similar) with Ignite 3.x in a scalable way. /Sakshi On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 at 15:33, Sakshi Raina <sakshirain...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Team, > > I’m currently working on a .NET-based application where we need to perform > fuzzy full-text searches on millions of records, all of which must be kept > in-memory only. > > Previously, I noted that Apache Ignite 2.x had support for full-text > search via Lucene integration, which aligned very well with our needs; > particularly using the TextQuery class. However, upon evaluating Apache > Ignite 3.0, I found that the Lucene-based search functionality is no longer > included. > > Given this, I have a few questions: > > > 1. > > Is there any plan to reintroduce Lucene-based full-text search (or any > fuzzy search support) in future Ignite 3.x releases? > 2. > > If not, do you have any architectural recommendations or best > practices for achieving fuzzy search capabilities using Apache Ignite 3.x, > particularly in a .NET context? > > Any guidance, insights, or roadmapping information you can provide > would be greatly appreciated. I’m happy to elaborate on our use case > further if that would help. > > Thank you for your time and for the work you do on Apache Ignite. > > > /Sakshi >
