Hello! There's an English version of Habr now, did you consider reposting there?
Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev чт, 21 мар. 2019 г. в 15:35, Dmitriy Pavlov <[email protected]>: > Sorry for the late reply. Contributors are not ranked so weight is not > measured. The community always prefer to build consensus. If consensus is > not reached (this happens time-to-time), then feature or change should not > appear in the product. > > By the way, Apache PMCs may veto changes with a technical justification > explaining why change is bad. > > A final word in project development has PMC (it is a committee consisting > of all its members). Practically Apache Ignite Community prefers wider > consensus - from all contributors. > > In case something is going wrong, there is our last resort: > https://www.apache.org/board/escalation But I don't remember any > escalations. > > Priority of implementing features is solved in another way: if someone > wants to implement something and the community does not reject it, so why > not? There is no single priority for all contributors. > > ср, 17 окт. 2018 г. в 12:09, zaleslaw <[email protected]>: > >> [For discussion] It's interesting to know more about possible conflicts: >> when >> a few persons are involved in contribution as a commiters, for example, >> and >> they have different opinions about next steps in roadmap implementation or >> about certain feature. How to measure correctly their weights? One of them >> doing small bug fixes, another does large features. They are not ranked, >> except amount of commits or code lines in github. Who can say last word? >> >> Imagine, only they are both understand something in this feature and its >> priority. Votes couldn't help, right? How they should solve their >> conflict? >> Does you have any cases in your experience? >> >> >> >> -- >> Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/ >> >
