Hi! I just wanted to show an example, when Write-through mode is enabled and data is persisted by primary node - not transaction coordinator.
Assume, we have transactional cache in cluster, near cache is disabled, node A is primary for key1, node B is neither primary nor backup for key1, and some backup nodes. And every node has its local db. If we start transaction on node B, then data would be persisted by primary node and perhaps by backup nodes, transaction coordinator would not open db connections. ср, 17 янв. 2018 г. в 3:59, vkulichenko <valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com>: > Aleksey, > > Are you talking about use case when a transaction spawns a distributed > cache > AND a local cache? If so, this sounds like a very weird use case. Do we > even > allow this? > > -Val > > > > -- > Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/ > -- *Best Regards,* *Kuznetsov Aleksey*
