Does this work for regular objects?
BWT: looks like a type when you set a builder to field instead of binary object itself "bb.build()" On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 4:32 PM, takumi <[email protected]> wrote: > I use SqlQuery for nested BinaryObject. > The BinaryObject instance is following structure. > > BinaryObjectBuilder bb2 = binary.builder("nested2 > hoge").setField("field2", "old", String.class); > BinaryObjectBuilder bb = binary.builder("nested > hoge").setField("field1", > bb2); > binary.builder("hoge").setField("field0", bb); > > The sample SQL to throw an exception is "update " + CACHE_NAME + " set > field2 = 'new'". > > The cause to throw an exception to is that I update a field of BinaryObject > which is child of nested BinaryObject . > When I update a field of BinaryObject which is nested BinaryObject, it do > not throw an exception. > > Should I not use this SQL for child of nested BinaryObject? > > > > -- > Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/ > -- Best regards, Andrey V. Mashenkov
