No, not yet. However, we have built Tez on CDH and it runs just fine. Following blog summarizes part of the work (bit old, we currently run Tez 0.9.1 on CDH 5.16.1).
https://blog.upala.com/2017/03/04/setting-up-tez-on-cdh-cluster/ Blog says use ATS from open source hadoop, which will not work if you've kerberized the cluster. You'll have to build a version of ATS against CDH libraries that provides the classes needed to run the engine. We have done this work as well and it runs pretty smoothly. On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 8:33 AM Edward Capriolo <edlinuxg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Out of band question. Given: > https://hortonworks.com/blog/welcome-brand-new-cloudera/ > > Does cdh finally ship with a tea you dont have to manually patch in? > On Monday, April 15, 2019, Sungwoo Park <glap...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I tested the performance of Impala 2.12.0+cdh5.15.2+0 in Cloudera CDH >> 5.15.2 a while ago. I compared it with Hive 3.1.1 on MR3 (where MR3 is a >> new execution engine for Hadoop and Kubernetes). You can find the result at: >> >> https://mr3.postech.ac.kr/blog/2019/03/22/performance-evaluation-0.6/ >> >> On average, Hive on MR3 is about 30% faster than Hive on Tez on >> sequential queries. For concurrent queries, the throughput of Hive on MR3 >> is about three times higher than Hive on Tez (when tested with 16 >> concurrent queries). You can find the result at: >> >> https://mr3.postech.ac.kr/blog/2018/10/30/performance-evaluation-0.4/ >> >> --- Sungwoo Park >> >> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 8:44 PM Artur Sukhenko <artur.sukhe...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> We are using CDH 5, with Impala 2.7.0-cdh5.9.1 and Hive 1.1 >>> (MapReduce) >>> I can't find the info regarding Hive on Tez performance compared to >>> Impala. >>> Does someone know or compared it? >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Artur Sukhenko >>> >> > > -- > Sorry this was sent from mobile. Will do less grammar and spell check than > usual. >
