Thanks Gopal.
I added a compact index to this table as below on 5 columns
hive> show formatted indexes on sales2;
OK
idx_name tab_name col_names
idx_tab_name idx_type comment
sales2_idx sales2 prod_id, cust_id, time_id,
channel_id, promo_id oraclehadoop__sales2_sales2_idx__ compact
But as I expected it, CBO ignores it
STAGE PLANS:
Stage: Stage-0
Fetch Operator
limit: -1
Processor Tree:
TableScan
alias: sales2
Statistics: Num rows: 22052232 Data size: 6527460672 Basic stats:
COMPLETE Column stats: NONE
Filter Operator
predicate: (((((prod_id = 13) and (cust_id = 50833)) and
(UDFToString(time_id) = '2000-12-26 00:00:00')) and (channel_id = 2)) and
(promo_id = 999)) (type: boolean)
Statistics: Num rows: 689132 Data size: 203983072 Basic stats:
COMPLETE Column stats: NONE
Select Operator
expressions: 13 (type: bigint), 50833 (type: bigint),
2000-12-26 00:00:00.0 (type: timestamp), 2 (type: bigint), 999 (type:
bigint), quantity_sold (type: decimal(10,0)), amount_sold (type:
decimal(10,0))
outputColumnNames: _col0, _col1, _col2, _col3, _col4, _col5,
_col6
Statistics: Num rows: 689132 Data size: 203983072 Basic
stats: COMPLETE Column stats: NONE
ListSink
thanks
Dr Mich Talebzadeh
LinkedIn *
https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=AAEAAAAWh2gBxianrbJd6zP6AcPCCdOABUrV8Pw
<https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=AAEAAAAWh2gBxianrbJd6zP6AcPCCdOABUrV8Pw>*
http://talebzadehmich.wordpress.com
*Disclaimer:* Use it at your own risk. Any and all responsibility for any
loss, damage or destruction of data or any other property which may arise
from relying on this email's technical content is explicitly disclaimed.
The author will in no case be liable for any monetary damages arising from
such loss, damage or destruction.
On 27 June 2016 at 17:38, Gopal Vijayaraghavan <gop...@apache.org> wrote:
> > It appears to me that Spark does not rely on statistics that are
> >collected by Hive on say ORC tables.
> > It seems that Spark uses its own optimization to query the Hive tables
> >irrespective of Hive has collected by way of statistics etc?
>
> Spark does not have a cost based optimizer yet - please follow this JIRA,
> which suggests that it is planned for the future.
>
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16026>
>
>
> > CLUSTERED BY (PROD_ID,CUST_ID,TIME_ID,CHANNEL_ID,PROMO_ID) INTO 256
> >BUCKETS
> ...
> > Table is sorted in the order of prod_id, cust_id,time_id, channel_id and
> >promo_id. It has 22 million rows.
>
> Not it is not.
>
> Due to whatever backwards compatbilitiy brain-damage of Hive-1, CLUSTERED
> BY *DOES* not CLUSTER at all.
>
> Add at least
>
> SORTED BY (PROD_ID)
>
> if what you care about is scanning performance with the ORC indexes.
>
>
> > And Hive on Spark returns the same 24 rows in 30 seconds
>
> That sounds slow for 22 million rows. That should be a 5-6 second query in
> Hive on a single 16-core box.
>
> Is this a build from source? Has the build got log4j1.x with INFO/DEBUG?
>
> > Assuming that the time taken will be optimization time + query time then
> >it appears that in most cases the optimization time does not really make
> >that impact on the overall performance?
>
> The optimizer's impact is most felt when you have 3+ joins - computing
> join order, filter transitivity etc.
>
> In this case, all the optimizer does is simplify predicates.
>
> Cheers,
> Gopal
>
>
>
