Thanks for the further votes. If I'm not mistaken three more would be missing for a successful vote.
@Carl, thanks for your vote. I'd behappy to hear any concerns you might have. @Ashutosh: Sounds like a very sensible idea. I've never actually gotten around to use Travis CI so I hope there'll be some documentation :) On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 9:19 PM, Ashutosh Chauhan <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > PS: Some of us are trying to enable travis-ci for Hive over on > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-10293 Since travis-ci limits > build time to ~30 mins, we can't run our full test suite on it. But, it > might make sense to use that infra for commits discussed here. In that > scenario a sanity build of compile on travis-ci will give confidence that > 'minor' commits like these are not resulting in compilation failure. > > On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Carl Steinbach <[email protected]> wrote: > >> -0 >> On Apr 22, 2016 4:04 PM, "Chao Sun" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Edward Capriolo <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> >>>> On Friday, April 22, 2016, Lars Francke <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Yet another update. I went through the PMC list. >>>>> >>>>> These seven have not been active (still the same list as Vikram posted >>>>> during the last vote): >>>>> Ashish Thusoo >>>>> Kevin Wilfong >>>>> He Yongqiang >>>>> Namit Jain >>>>> Joydeep Sensarma >>>>> Ning Zhang >>>>> Raghotham Murthy >>>>> >>>>> There are 29 PMCs in total - 7 = 22 active * 2/3 = 15 votes required >>>>> >>>>> So far the following PMCs have voted: >>>>> >>>>> Alan Gates >>>>> Jason Dere >>>>> Sushanth Sowmyan >>>>> Lefty Leverenz >>>>> Navis Ryu >>>>> Owen O'Malley >>>>> Prasanth J >>>>> Sergey Shelukhin >>>>> Thejas Nair >>>>> >>>>> = 9 +1s >>>>> >>>>> So I'm hoping for six more. I've contacted a bunch of PMCs (sorry for >>>>> the spam!) and hope to get a few more. >>>>> >>>>> In addition there have been six non-binding +1s. Thank you everyone >>>>> for voting. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Lars Francke <[email protected] >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi everyone, thanks for the votes. I've been held up by personal >>>>>> stuff this week but as there have been no -1s or other objections I'd >>>>>> like >>>>>> to keep this vote open a bit longer until I've had time to go through the >>>>>> PMCs and contact those that have not yet voted. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 9:12 PM, Denise Rogers <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> Denise >>>>>>> Cell - (860)989-3431 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sent from mi iPhone >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Apr 21, 2016, at 2:56 PM, Sergey Shelukhin < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> From: Tim Robertson <[email protected]> >>>>>>> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>>>>>> Date: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 at 06:17 >>>>>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Bylaws change to allow some commits without >>>>>>> review >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:24 AM, Jimmy Xiang <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Alpesh Patel < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> > +1 >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Lars Francke < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> Thanks everyone! Vote runs for at least one more day. I'd >>>>>>>> appreciate it if >>>>>>>> >> you could ping/bump your colleagues to chime in here. >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> I'm not entirely sure how many PMC members are active and how >>>>>>>> many votes >>>>>>>> >> we need but I think a few more are probably needed. >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:02 PM, Thejas Nair < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>> >> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> +1 >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> ________________________________ >>>>>>>> >>> From: Wei Zheng <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> >>> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 10:51 AM >>>>>>>> >>> To: [email protected] >>>>>>>> >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Bylaws change to allow some commits without >>>>>>>> review >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> +1 >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> >>> Wei >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> From: Siddharth Seth <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> >>> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> >>> Date: Monday, April 18, 2016 at 10:29 >>>>>>>> >>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Bylaws change to allow some commits without >>>>>>>> review >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> +1 >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Lars Francke < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>> >>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> we had a discussion on the dev@ list about allowing some >>>>>>>> forms of >>>>>>>> >>>> contributions to be committed without a review. >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> The exact sentence I propose to add is: "Minor issues (e.g. >>>>>>>> typos, code >>>>>>>> >>>> style issues, JavaDoc changes. At committer's discretion) can >>>>>>>> be committed >>>>>>>> >>>> after soliciting feedback/review on the mailing list and not >>>>>>>> receiving >>>>>>>> >>>> feedback within 2 days." >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> The proposed bylaws can also be seen here >>>>>>>> >>>> < >>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/Proposed+Changes+to+Hive+Project+Bylaws+-+April+2016 >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> This vote requires a 2/3 majority of all Active PMC members so >>>>>>>> I'd love >>>>>>>> >>>> to get as many votes as possible. The vote will run for at >>>>>>>> least six days. >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> >>>> Lars >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Sorry this was sent from mobile. Will do less grammar and spell check >>>> than usual. >>>> >>> >>> >
