I have this issue for all hive queries.

In fact, I've tried only two types of queries (with UNION ALL) and simple
queries like SELECT field1, field2 FROM table SOME_TABLE WHERE
field2=SOME_CONST;

Thanks.

On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Bejoy KS <bejoy...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> **
> Hi Alexander
> Are you have a single node execution issue only for this particular query
> that involves Union all or is it same across all hive queries.
> Regards
> Bejoy KS
>
> Sent from handheld, please excuse typos.
> ------------------------------
> *From: * Alexander Goryunov <a.goryu...@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Fri, 4 May 2012 17:23:24 +0400
> *To: *<user@hive.apache.org>; Bejoy Ks<bejoy...@yahoo.com>
> *ReplyTo: * user@hive.apache.org
> *Subject: *Re: Distributed execution for UNION ALL
>
> Hi Bejoy KS,
>
> Thanks for your answer.
>
> from job.xml:
> *mapred.job.tracker* =full.namenode.hostname:8021
>
>
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Bejoy Ks <bejoy...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Alexander
>>       Since the tasks are just executing on local node. Looks like hive
>> map reduce jobs are running locally. What is the value for *
>> mapred.job.tracker *in your job.xml or from mapred-site.xml?
>>
>> Regards
>> Bejoy KS
>>
>>   ------------------------------
>> *From:* Alexander Goryunov <a.goryu...@gmail.com>
>> *To:* user@hive.apache.org
>> *Sent:* Friday, May 4, 2012 6:22 PM
>> *Subject:* Distributed execution for UNION ALL
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have a query like
>>
>> SELECT * FROM (
>> SELECT 1, concat(1_timestamp, ', ', 2_account_id )
>> FROM table_1 WHERE 2_account_id = 1132576 LIMIT 1000000000
>> UNION ALL
>> SELECT 2, concat(1_timestamp, ', ', 2_account_id )
>> FROM table_2 WHERE 2_account_id = 1132576 LIMIT 1000000000
>> UNION ALL
>> SELECT 3, concat(1_timestamp, ', ', 2_account_id )
>> FROM table_3 WHERE 2_account_id = 1132576 LIMIT 1000000000
>> UNION ALL
>> .... // some hundred tables here
>> ) res;
>>
>> Parallel jobs set to true in hive config and it creates mapreduce max map
>> tasks on the requested node.
>>
>> What should be done to distribute that jobs over the all cluster nodes?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to