On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote:
> I prefer to patch the POMs. > Is this a formal -1? I've opened HBASE-13637 for tracking this issue. Let's get it fixed and I'll spin a new RC tonight. > On May 5, 2015, at 4:16 PM, Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > So what's the conclusion here? Are we dropping 2.2 support or updating > the > > poms and sinking the RC? > > > >> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> We could patch our POMs to reference the hadoop-minikdc artifact > >>> independently of the rest of the Hadoop packages. It's standalone and > >>> rarely changes. > >> +1. I've been using HBase to test Hadoop changes for isolating > dependencies > >> from downstream folks (HADOOP-11804), and I've just been leaving the > >> hadoop-minikdc artifact as-is due to these very reasons. > >> > >> -- > >> Sean > >> >
