Survey: Is anyone using the Thrift 2 interface? Not here.
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Kiran Kumar.M.R <kiran.kumar...@huawei.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> Our customers were using Hbase-0.94 through thrift1 (C++ clients). >> Now HBase is getting upgraded to 0.98.x >> >> I see that thrift2 development is going on ( >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8818) >> > > It has stalled with quite a while now. > > > >> Customers are interested in continuing to use thrift1 as they are not >> interested in new capability given in thrift2 and also minimize their >> application changes as much as possible. >> >> What should be our direction in using thrift interface? >> >> - Shall we continue to use thrift1? (Will this continue to be >> supported, I see some mail threads on making it deprecated) >> >> > IMO this would be safest. > > > >> - Or suggest our customers to switch to thrift2? >> > > > Unless anyone is interested in seeing through the thrift2 project to the > finish, I think we should just purge it from the codebase and stay thrift1. > > St.Ack -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)