On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 11:48 AM Karim Hamrouni <hamrouni.ka...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi team,
>
> I hope you're doing well.
>
> The "alternate full address:s:value" field is an official option in RDP
> files. see Microsoft website.
> This option is very useful when we want to connect to a server other than
> the default one.
> Indeed, in many cases, the RDP file is automatically generated by a tool.
> The only option we have is to use the RDP files options to establish a
> connection to another server according to specific cases.
> Also, we would like guacamole to support this information.
>
> Thank you for showing me the path to follow.
>
>
Karim,
You already asked this in a previous thread ([1]), and I responded to you,
but you never answered my follow-up question:

Hmmm...I don't exactly understand what you mean, here - why does
Guacamole's configuration in any way depend on the RDP files that are being
generated? Guacamole does not read these files, and you can configure it to
use whichever hostname you want. Can you explain why Guacamole needs to
support any additional fields in order to connect to the server?

It is unclear to me why 1) it matters what is in an RDP file at all, since
Guacamole cannot and does not read those RDP files, and 2) why you need
Guacamole to support this alternate host field? I do not understand from
your original thread, or your description, here, how this is useful? You
say, "this option is very useful when we want to connect to a server other
than the default one," but in Guacamole you could just set up two different
connections - one that points to your "default server" and another that
points to the "alternate server."

It would be helpful if you could describe, in detail (without disclosing
sensitive information, of course), exactly how you would expect to use this
in Guacamole. Maybe give a brief overview of the network architecture -
where does Guacamole run in relation to these servers? How have you
configured Guacamole? What isn't working that you think having this
additional field would solve?

-Nick

[1] - https://lists.apache.org/thread/g7tykp8lp3lqczojpn5119f33cp5g3k8

>

Reply via email to