Dear ivanmarcus, To be specific. You say MSRDWC uses a lot less bandwidth than Guacamole, however (if I understand correctly) from what you say you're using Guacamole with a Xrdp client machine, and MSRDWC with a MSRD client machine. I suggest you should first test with Guacamole to the MSRD client, and then MSRDWC to the *same* client with the *same* parameters and the *same* series of tests. IOW the *only* change in the lineup is MSRDWC vs Guacamole - NOT the client machine as
I am done the setup of MSRDC at my place and measuring the sam scenario Guacamole to xrdp client ---- When connecting through browser to guacamole it's low bandwidth . when connect guacad to xrdp host its huge bandwidth. Guacamole to MSRDC client-- We test this setup with guacamole to MSRDC host through client there is also a bandwidth utilization . we measure theough wireshark MSRDC to same client -- When i am connected to MSRDC with same parameter of bpp, width , height etc and measure through wireshark there is tremendous different , its take very low bandwidth . When I am in idle mode in guacamole to xrdp its continuously check keepalive and bandwidth utilizated that time. When i am in idle in MSRDC there is no keepalive checking see in wireshark hence bandits is very low . On Tue, 10 Mar 2020, 02:00 ivanmarcus, <[email protected]> wrote: > Manoj, > > We may have exhausted our ability to help. As Stefan has pointed out there > have been a number of suggestions and explanations around the issue you > raise; it could be useful if you were to pursue those in the first instance. > > One thing that strikes me from your latest post is that you're introducing > too many variables when attempting to compare systems. If you want to make > comparisons then you should start with as identical a system as possible > and change just *one* parameter first. In this way you will generally be a > lot clearer around what changes have an affect on something. > > To be specific. You say MSRDWC uses a lot less bandwidth than Guacamole, > however (if I understand correctly) from what you say you're using > Guacamole with a Xrdp client machine, and MSRDWC with a MSRD client > machine. I suggest you should first test with Guacamole to the MSRD client, > and then MSRDWC to the *same* client with the *same* parameters and the > *same* series of tests. IOW the *only* change in the lineup is MSRDWC vs > Guacamole - NOT the client machine as well. > > Moving on from this, I don't have access to MSRDWC and have never used it > but if possible the next test might be to utilise it with an Xrdp client > machine and compare that with Guacamole to the *same* client. Such logical > steps would lend much more credence to your results, and may provide a > clearer pointer to you as to where the issue, if there is one, lays. > > > > On 9/03/2020 8:58 p.m., Manoj Patil wrote: > > Dear, > > Any Resolution on my Issues. > > Please suggest any changes at guacamole server and Xrdp host server. > > > On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 at 13:22, Manoj Patil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Dear ivanmarcus/mike, >> >> The MSRDP setup is done at my end for testing purpose with same user >> ,same screen,same depth etc. we measure the bandith for singile session and >> it is too low. i am already sharing a snapshot in preious mail. >> >> *My point is if i used MSRDP web client to acees the server it take low >> bandwidth utilization . when i am using guacd with xrdp it uses high >> bandwidth.* >> >> >> >> >
