On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 11:48 AM Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> > > On Oct 25, 2016, at 11:56 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 8:03 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:27 PM Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> > wrote: > >>> > >>> What I’m taking from this thread is that: > >>> > >>> 1) We (the Geode project) need to rework the README now that we have > maven > >>> artifacts available. > >> > >> I'm not sure the relationship. There's two issues I see with the > current > >> docs. > >> > >> 1. They're pointing to Pivotal, meaning you need to go to a vendor to > >> understand how to use Geode. While I understand this was a late > donation > >> from Pivotal, it should be treated as a priority to use ASF docs. > > > > Thanks for spotting a couple of links in the README -- we need to change > it. > > I just posted a review for updating the links, this should be fixed soon. > Thanks - looks better. I'm wondering, is there a plan to migrate the Python client under ASF? And can you add a link to the actual client library for Geode on the README? Otherwise, the first link is still a 3rd party. It may be better to categorize the unofficial clients vs official clients (Java, REST) > > Anthony > >
