Hi Swapnil,

For some regions we do not have any expiration and for some others we have
below:

<entry-time-to-live>
            <expiration-attributes timeout="900" action="destroy"/>
</entry-time-to-live>

Thanks,

Arghya



On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 5:22 AM, Swapnil Bawaskar <sbawas...@pivotal.io>
wrote:

> Hi Arghya,
>
> With hibernate l2, all requests do a get() on geode, followed by fetching
> from the RDBMS. Are you seeing this while the application is being
> bootstrapped i.e. the cache is still warming up? What eviction policy are
> you using and what is the access pattern of you application?
>
> Thanks!
> Swapnil.
>
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 12:55 AM, arghya sadhu <arghy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am using geode as hibernate L2 cache without any cache loader or cache
>> writer.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Arghya
>> On Aug 10, 2015 12:45 PM, "Udo Kohlmeyer" <ukohlme...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Arghya,
>>>
>>> If you think of Geode like a cache, totalHitCount would mean the total
>>> number of times you found values when doing a get() with a key. Similarly
>>> totalMissCount would mean the total number of time you did not find a value
>>> when doing a get().
>>>
>>> Usually a higher hitCount is better than a lower hitCount, because it
>>> means that you could find the data for a key lookup.
>>>
>>> Are you using CacheLoaders? As typically a low hitCount could mean that
>>> the data that is being looked up is not within Geode and one is trying to
>>> load it (read-through) from a data source. Or it could mean that some one
>>> is trying to look up keys that don't exist within your Region.
>>>
>>> How are you using/interacting with Geode?
>>>
>>> --Udo
>>>
>>> On 08/10/2015 04:53 PM, arghya sadhu wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> What is the meaning of low totalHitCount and high totalMissCount while
>>>> running show metrics in gfsh console.In my application I am seeing  low
>>>> totalHitCount and high totalMissCount.Hence i want to know if this is ok or
>>>> something to worry about?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Arghya
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>

Reply via email to