Oops, sent this discussion to wrong mailing list, please disregard meant to go to dev
On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 2:18 PM Daniel Rossos <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Starting a discussion thread about improvements that can be made to the > Kubernetes networking attached to the FlinkBlueGreenDeployments. I have > raised the issue that prompted this discussion in FLINK-38577 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-38577> and wanted to see > what approaches people are thinking would be best. > > As mentioned in the ticket the first thoughts I had would be something > like 1 svc and 1 ingress that will dynamically bind to whatever > FlinkDeployment is active. That way would avoid the need for multiple > services and ingresses to keep coming up and keep naming + address of those > resources stable despite the underlying Flink deployments changing. > > Have yet to prototype that though (will try to get something early this > week there), but would love preliminary feedback and thoughts. > > Thanks, > > Daniel >
