Hi Gyula, thank you very much for the update about the release schedule and for pointing me to the snapshot images. This is indeed very helpful and we will consider our options now.
Regards, Niklas > On 16. Oct 2023, at 17:56, Gyula Fóra <gyula.f...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Niklas! > > We weren't planning a 1.6.1 release and instead we were focusing on wrapping > up changes for the 1.7.0 release coming in a month or so. > > However if there is enough interest and we have some committers/PMC willing > to help with the release we can always do 1.6.1 but I personally don't have > the bandwidth for it right now. > > In case you want to pick up the latest 1.6 backported fixes, you could either > create a custom operator build or simply pick up the image built from the > branch automatically [1] > This would probably be an easy way to get the fixes into your environment. > But of course this is not an official release, just a snapshot version so you > have to do your own verification to make sure it works for you. > > Cheers, > Gyula > > [1] > https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/pkgs/container/flink-kubernetes-operator/127962962?tag=3f0dc2e > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 5:41 PM Niklas Wilcke <niklas.wil...@uniberg.com > <mailto:niklas.wil...@uniberg.com>> wrote: >> Hi Flink Community, >> >> we are waiting for the next release of the Flink Kubernetes Operator, >> because we are experiencing problems with loosing the HA metadata similar to >> FLINK-33011 [0]. >> Since the problem is already fixed and also backported to the 1.6 branch >> [1], my question would be whether we can expect a release soon? >> Any input is highly appreciated. Thank you! >> >> Regards, >> Niklas >> >> >> [0] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-33011 >> [1] https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/commits/release-1.6
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
