Thanks for the information. On Tue, Jun 6, 2023, 6:07 AM Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org> wrote:
> If you were to fork it /and want to redistribute it/ then the short > version is that > > 1. you have to adhere to the Apache licensing requirements > 2. you have to make it clear that your fork does not belong to the > Apache Flink project. (Trademarks and all that) > > Neither should be significant hurdles (there should also be plenty of > online resources regarding 1), and if you do this then you can freely > share your fork with others. > > I've also pinged Martijn to take a look at this thread. > To my knowledge the project hasn't decided anything yet. > > On 27/05/2023 04:05, Galen Warren wrote: > > Ok, I get it. No interest. > > > > If this project is being abandoned, I guess I'll work with my own fork. > Is > > there anything I should consider here? Can I share it with other people > who > > use this project? > > > > On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 10:50 AM Galen Warren<ga...@cvillewarrens.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi Martijn, since you opened this discussion thread, I'm curious what > your > >> thoughts are in light of the responses? Thanks. > >> > >> On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 1:21 PM Galen Warren<ga...@cvillewarrens.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> I use Apache Flink for stream processing, and StateFun as a hand-off > >>>> point for the rest of the application. > >>>> It serves well as a bridge between a Flink Streaming job and > >>>> micro-services. > >>> > >>> This is essentially how I use it as well, and I would also be sad to > see > >>> it sunsetted. It works well; I don't know that there is a lot of new > >>> development required, but if there are no new Statefun releases, then > >>> Statefun can only be used with older Flink versions. > >>> > >>> On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 10:04 PM Marco Villalobos < > >>> mvillalo...@kineteque.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> I am currently using Stateful Functions in my application. > >>>> > >>>> I use Apache Flink for stream processing, and StateFun as a hand-off > >>>> point for the rest of the application. > >>>> It serves well as a bridge between a Flink Streaming job and > >>>> micro-services. > >>>> > >>>> I would be disappointed if StateFun was sunsetted. Its a good idea. > >>>> > >>>> If there is anything I can do to help, as a contributor perhaps, > please > >>>> let me know. > >>>> > >>>>> On Apr 3, 2023, at 2:02 AM, Martijn Visser<martijnvis...@apache.org> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> Hi everyone, > >>>>> > >>>>> I want to open a discussion on the status of the Statefun Project [1] > >>>> in Apache Flink. As you might have noticed, there hasn't been much > >>>> development over the past months in the Statefun repository [2]. > There is > >>>> currently a lack of active contributors and committers who are able > to help > >>>> with the maintenance of the project. > >>>>> In order to improve the situation, we need to solve the lack of > >>>> committers and the lack of contributors. > >>>>> On the lack of committers: > >>>>> > >>>>> 1. Ideally, there are some of the current Flink committers who have > >>>> the bandwidth and can help with reviewing PRs and merging them. > >>>>> 2. If that's not an option, it could be a consideration that current > >>>> committers only approve and review PRs, that are approved by those > who are > >>>> willing to contribute to Statefun and if the CI passes > >>>>> On the lack of contributors: > >>>>> > >>>>> 3. Next to having this discussion on the Dev and User mailing list, > we > >>>> can also create a blog with a call for new contributors on the Flink > >>>> project website, send out some tweets on the Flink / Statefun twitter > >>>> accounts, post messages on Slack etc. In that message, we would > inform how > >>>> those that are interested in contributing can start and where they > could > >>>> reach out for more information. > >>>>> There's also option 4. where a group of interested people would split > >>>> Statefun from the Flink project and make it a separate top level > project > >>>> under the Apache Flink umbrella (similar as recently has happened with > >>>> Flink Table Store, which has become Apache Paimon). > >>>>> If we see no improvements in the coming period, we should consider > >>>> sunsetting Statefun and communicate that clearly to the users. > >>>>> I'm looking forward to your thoughts. > >>>>> > >>>>> Best regards, > >>>>> > >>>>> Martijn > >>>>> > >>>>> [1]https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-statefun-docs-master/ < > >>>> https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-statefun-docs-master/> > >>>>> [2]https://github.com/apache/flink-statefun < > >>>> https://github.com/apache/flink-statefun> > >>>> >
