I think this blog article is good enough for the Scala support awareness: https://flink.apache.org/2022/02/22/scala-free.html In my opinion, it would be much better if one of the Scala-wrappers community project moves under umbrella of *org.apache.flink *to have a chance to survive longer.
Alexey On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 8:59 AM Martijn Visser <martijnvis...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > Is there anything that the Flink community could do to raise awareness? > Perhaps it would be interesting for the maintainers to write a short blog > post about it, which potentially could drive traffic? > > Best regards, > > Martijn > > On Sun, Feb 5, 2023 at 4:39 PM Alexey Novakov via user < > user@flink.apache.org> wrote: > >> Hi Erwan, >> >> I think those 2 projects you mentioned are pretty much the options we >> have at the moment if you want to use Scala 2.13 or 3. >> I believe your contribution to upgrade one of them to Flink 1.16 will be >> very welcomed. >> >> Best regards, >> Alex >> >> On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 9:32 AM Erwan Loisant <er...@loisant.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Back in October, the Flink team announced that the Scala API was to be >>> deprecated them removed. Which I think is perfectly fine, having third >>> party develop Scala wrappers is a good approach. >>> >>> With the announce I expected those wrapper projects to get steam, >>> however both projects linked in the announcement ( >>> https://github.com/findify/flink-adt and >>> https://github.com/ariskk/flink4s) don't seem much maintained, and are >>> stuck on Flink 1.15. >>> >>> Any team here using Flink with Scala are moving away from the official >>> Scala API? Maybe there is a project that I'm missing that is getting more >>> attentions than the 2 linked aboved? >>> >>> >>> Thank you! >>> Erwan >>> >>