I think this blog article is good enough for the Scala support awareness:
https://flink.apache.org/2022/02/22/scala-free.html
In my opinion, it would be much better if one of the Scala-wrappers
community project moves under umbrella of *org.apache.flink *to have a
chance to survive longer.

Alexey


On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 8:59 AM Martijn Visser <martijnvis...@apache.org>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Is there anything that the Flink community could do to raise awareness?
> Perhaps it would be interesting for the maintainers to write a short blog
> post about it, which potentially could drive traffic?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Martijn
>
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2023 at 4:39 PM Alexey Novakov via user <
> user@flink.apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Erwan,
>>
>> I think those 2 projects you mentioned are pretty much the options we
>> have at the moment if you want to use Scala 2.13 or 3.
>> I believe your contribution to upgrade one of them to Flink 1.16 will be
>> very welcomed.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Alex
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 9:32 AM Erwan Loisant <er...@loisant.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Back in October, the Flink team announced that the Scala API was to be
>>> deprecated them removed. Which I think is perfectly fine, having third
>>> party develop Scala wrappers is a good approach.
>>>
>>> With the announce I expected those wrapper projects to get steam,
>>> however both projects linked in the announcement (
>>> https://github.com/findify/flink-adt and
>>> https://github.com/ariskk/flink4s) don't seem much maintained, and are
>>> stuck on Flink 1.15.
>>>
>>> Any team here using Flink with Scala are moving away from the official
>>> Scala API? Maybe there is a project that I'm missing that is getting more
>>> attentions than the 2 linked aboved?
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you!
>>> Erwan
>>>
>>

Reply via email to