I think the richful functional programming features in scala are better. regards.
On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 4:24 PM HG <hanspeter.sl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Because? > I am using IntelliJ. > What are the drawbacks of Java then? > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2022, 19:05 sri hari kali charan Tummala < > kali.tumm...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Yes Scala is the best. >> >> On Fri, Jan 28, 2022, 9:57 AM Nicolás Ferrario <nferrari...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Seb. >>> >>> In my team we are migrating things to Kotlin because we find it much >>> easier to deal with. It's like the best of both worlds, but you do give up >>> on Flink Scala serializers, since the only way to get Kotlin Data Classes >>> working is by making them a POJO (or implementing your own TypeInfo). You >>> do at least gain Evolution support. >>> >>> We've found that Kotlin + Gradle are a great combination, and we end up >>> with quick compile times, a much simpler build config (compared to Maven >>> and SBT). >>> Another thing is that we've found that the macro createTypeInformation >>> can be dangerous, because sometimes it may fallback to Kryo on classes you >>> don't expect it to. Those implicit behaviors we see in Scala have caused us >>> some headaches and we prefer to explicitly type things in the Data Stream. >>> Just personal preference, but pointing it out in case it's useful to >>> someone. >>> >>> Hope this helps! >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 7:15 AM seb <sebunderthe...@protonmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi there, >>>> >>>> I am getting started with Apache Flink. I am curious whether there is a >>>> clear winner between developing in either Scala or Java. >>>> >>>> It sounds like Flink is typically slower to support new versions of >>>> Scala and that Java development might have fewer quirks. >>>> >>>> What do you think? I have experience coding in Scala, but I am more >>>> than happy to learn Java. >>>> >>>> Thanks in advance for sharing your thoughts! >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Sebastian >>>> >>>
