Hi all,

I added a CoGroup to my batch job, and it’s now running much slower, primarily 
due to back pressure from the CoGroup operator.

I assume it’s because this operator is having to sort/buffer-to-disk all 
incoming data. Looks like about 1TB from one side of the join, currently very 
little from the other but will be up to 2TB in the future.

I don’t see lots of GC, I’m using about 60% of available network buffers, per 
TM server load (for all 8 servers) is about 40% average, and both SSDs on each 
TM are being used for …/flink-io-xxx/yyy.channel files.

What are techniques for improving the performance of a CoGroup? 

Thanks!

— Ken

--------------------------
Ken Krugler
http://www.scaleunlimited.com
custom big data solutions & training
Hadoop, Cascading, Cassandra & Solr

Reply via email to