Hi, Felipe 

sorry for late reply.
You can try to config taskmanager.numberOfTaskSlots = 1 and use different 
slotSharingGroup to make sure Task do not placed in same TM.

Best
Weihua Hu

> 2020年5月29日 17:07,Felipe Gutierrez <felipe.o.gutier...@gmail.com> 写道:
> 
> Using slotSharingGroup I can do some placement. however, I am using
> two different slotSharingGroup for two different sources, even though
> they are placed in the same TM. And this starts splitting the
> downstream operators in different TM as well.
> 
> stream01 = source01.slot1 -> map01(4).slot1 -> flatmap01(4).slot1 \
> stream02 = source02.slot2 -> map02(4).slot2 -> flatmap02(4).slot2 /
>  |-> stream01.union(stream02) -> keyBy -> reducer(8).slot3
> 
> I am not sure which configuration I can adjust in the
> conf/flink-conf.yaml file to make it works. Currently, my
> configuration is like this bellow on the four TMs.
> 
> taskmanager.numberOfTaskSlots: 4
> parallelism.default: 4
> 
> Maybe if I use different numberOfTaskSlots on different TMs would it work?
> 
> --
> -- Felipe Gutierrez
> -- skype: felipe.o.gutierrez
> -- https://felipeogutierrez.blogspot.com
> 
> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 9:00 AM Felipe Gutierrez
> <felipe.o.gutier...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> because I am measuring one operator (all instances) and I want to
>> place its downstream operators in another machine in order to use
>> network channels.
>> 
>> --
>> -- Felipe Gutierrez
>> -- skype: felipe.o.gutierrez
>> -- https://felipeogutierrez.blogspot.com
>> 
>> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 4:59 AM Weihua Hu <huweihua....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi, Felipe
>>> 
>>> Flink does not support run tasks on specified TM.
>>> You can use slotSharingGroup to control Tasks not in same Slot, but cannot 
>>> specified which TM.
>>> 
>>> Can you please give the reason for specifying TM?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Best
>>> Weihua Hu
>>> 
>>> 2020年5月28日 21:37,Felipe Gutierrez <felipe.o.gutier...@gmail.com> 写道:
>>> 
>>> For instance, if I have the following DAG with the respect parallelism
>>> in parenthesis (I hope the dag appears real afterall):
>>> 
>>> source01 -> map01(4) -> flatmap01(4) \
>>> 
>>> |-> keyBy -> reducer(8)
>>> source02 -> map02(4) -> flatmap02(4) /
>>> 
>>> And I have 4 TMs in 4 machines with 4 cores each. I would like to
>>> place source01 and map01 and flatmap01 in TM-01. source02 and map02
>>> and flatmap02 in TM-02. I am using "disableChaning()" in the faltMap
>>> operator to measure it. And reducer1-to-4 in TM-03 and reducer5-to-8
>>> in TM-04.
>>> 
>>> I am using the methods "setParallelism()" and "slotSharingGroup()" to
>>> define it but both source01 and source02 are placed in TM-01 and map01
>>> is split into 2 TMs. The same with map02.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Felipe
>>> --
>>> -- Felipe Gutierrez
>>> -- skype: felipe.o.gutierrez
>>> -- https://felipeogutierrez.blogspot.com
>>> 
>>> 

Reply via email to