Let us know if you should run into any problems. The state processor API is still young and could benefit from as much feedback as possible.
Cheers, Till On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 2:57 AM LakeShen <shenleifight...@gmail.com> wrote: > Wow,this feature is look so good,I will see this feature. > Thank you to reply me , Till😀. > > Best Regards, > LakeShen > > Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> 于2020年3月17日周二 上午4:17写道: > >> If you want to change the max parallelism then you need to take a >> savepoint and use Flink's state processor API [1] to rewrite the max >> parallelism by creating a new savepoint from the old one. >> >> [1] >> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-stable/dev/libs/state_processor_api.html >> >> Cheers, >> Till >> >> On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 4:07 AM LakeShen <shenleifight...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Eleanore , if you resume from savepoint , you can't change the flink >>> operator's max parallelism . >>> >>> Eleanore Jin <eleanore....@gmail.com> 于2020年3月14日周六 上午12:51写道: >>> >>> > Hi Piotr, >>> > Does this also apply to savepoint? (meaning the max parallelism should >>> not >>> > change for job resume from savepoint?) >>> > >>> > Thanks a lot! >>> > Eleanore >>> > >>> > On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 6:33 AM Piotr Nowojski <pi...@ververica.com> >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> > > Hi, >>> > > >>> > > Yes, you can change the parallelism. One thing that you can not >>> change is >>> > > “max parallelism”. >>> > > >>> > > Piotrek >>> > > >>> > > > On 13 Mar 2020, at 04:34, Sivaprasanna <sivaprasanna...@gmail.com> >>> > > wrote: >>> > > > >>> > > > I think you can modify the operator’s parallelism. It is only if >>> you >>> > > have set maxParallelism, and while restoring from a checkpoint, you >>> > > shouldn’t modify the maxParallelism. Otherwise, I believe the state >>> will >>> > be >>> > > lost. >>> > > > >>> > > > - >>> > > > Sivaprasanna >>> > > > >>> > > > On Fri, 13 Mar 2020 at 9:01 AM, LakeShen < >>> shenleifight...@gmail.com >>> > > <mailto:shenleifight...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> > > > Hi community, >>> > > > I have a question is that I cancel the flink task and retain >>> the >>> > > checkpoint dir, then restore from the checkpoint dir ,can I change >>> the >>> > > flink operator's parallelism,in my thoughts, I think I can't change >>> the >>> > > flink operator's parallelism,but I am not sure. >>> > > > Thanks to your reply. >>> > > > >>> > > > Best wishes, >>> > > > LakeShen >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >>> >>