+1 for dropping Best,
Dawid On 24/02/2020 08:22, Yu Li wrote: > +1 for dropping savepoint compatibility with Flink 1.2. > > Best Regards, > Yu > > > On Sat, 22 Feb 2020 at 22:05, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org > <mailto:u...@apache.org>> wrote: > > Hey Stephan, > > +1. > > Reading over the linked ticket and your description here, I think > it makes a lot of sense to go ahead with this. Since it's possible > to upgrade via intermediate Flink releases as a fail-safe I don't > have any concerns. > > – Ufuk > > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 4:34 PM Till Rohrmann > <trohrm...@apache.org <mailto:trohrm...@apache.org>> wrote: > > > > +1 for dropping savepoint compatibility with Flink 1.2. > > > > Cheers, > > Till > > > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 6:55 PM Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org > <mailto:se...@apache.org>> wrote: > >> > >> Thank you for the feedback. > >> > >> Here is the JIRA issue with some more explanation also about > the background and implications: > >> https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16192 > >> > >> Best, > >> Stephan > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 2:26 PM vino yang > <yanghua1...@gmail.com <mailto:yanghua1...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >>> > >>> +1 for dropping Savepoint compatibility with Flink 1.2 > >>> > >>> Flink 1.2 is quite far away from the latest 1.10. Especially > after the release of Flink 1.9 and 1.10, the code and architecture > have undergone major changes. > >>> > >>> Currently, I am updating state migration tests for Flink 1.10. > I can still see some binary snapshot files of version 1.2. If we > agree on this topic, we may be able to alleviate some of the > burdens(remove those binary files) when the migration tests would > be updated later. > >>> > >>> Best, > >>> Vino > >>> > >>> Theo Diefenthal <theo.diefent...@scoop-software.de > <mailto:theo.diefent...@scoop-software.de>> 于2020年2月20日周四 > 下午9:04写道： > >>>> > >>>> +1 for dropping compatibility. > >>>> > >>>> I personally think that it is very important for a project to > keep a good pace in developing that old legacy stuff must be > dropped from time to time. As long as there is an upgrade routine > (via going to another flink release) that's fine. > >>>> > >>>> ________________________________ > >>>> Von: "Stephan Ewen" <se...@apache.org <mailto:se...@apache.org>> > >>>> An: "dev" <d...@flink.apache.org > <mailto:d...@flink.apache.org>>, "user" <user@flink.apache.org > <mailto:user@flink.apache.org>> > >>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 20. Februar 2020 11:11:43 > >>>> Betreff: [DISCUSS] Drop Savepoint Compatibility with Flink 1.2 > >>>> > >>>> Hi all! > >>>> For some cleanup and simplifications, it would be helpful to > drop Savepoint compatibility with Flink version 1.2. That version > was released almost three years ago. > >>>> > >>>> I would expect that no one uses that old version any more in > a way that they actively want to upgrade directly to 1.11. > >>>> > >>>> Even if, there is still the way to first upgrade to another > version (like 1.9) and then upgrade to 1.11 from there. > >>>> > >>>> Any concerns to drop that support? > >>>> > >>>> Best, > >>>> Stephan > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> SCOOP Software GmbH - Gut Maarhausen - Eiler Straße 3 P - > D-51107 Köln > >>>> Theo Diefenthal > >>>> > >>>> T +49 221 801916-196 - F +49 221 801916-17 - M +49 160 90506575 > >>>> theo.diefent...@scoop-software.de > <mailto:theo.diefent...@scoop-software.de> - www.scoop-software.de > <http://www.scoop-software.de> > >>>> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Köln, Handelsregister: Köln, > >>>> Handelsregisternummer: HRB 36625 > >>>> Geschäftsführung: Dr. Oleg Balovnev, Frank Heinen, > >>>> Martin Müller-Rohde, Dr. Wolfgang Reddig, Roland Scheel >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
