Hi, This is a known issue of Flink. For example key groups can have sizes +/- 1 and they are currently randomly distributed across the cluster, so some machines will get more keys to handle then the others. If the number of keys is relatively small, like 3 keys per key group, the load difference can be quite large (some machines may get almost only key groups with size 2 while others will get mostly with size of 3, making 50% load difference).
Unfortunately I don’t know about any concrete plans to address it. Maybe Till will know something more (I CC’ed him). Also I don’t think it’s exposed via a metric anywhere. Piotrek > On 22 Oct 2019, at 10:00, Flavio Pompermaier <pomperma...@okkam.it> wrote: > > Hi to all, > I was looking into the Flink example of the Flink training trying to > understand why in the ClickEventCount[1] one task manager was reading twice > the speed of the other. > > I had to debug a lot of internal code of Flink to understand that it depends > on the adopted hash function (used by Flink to assign keys to taskmanagers) > that was assigning 4 keys to a TM and 2 to the other. Is there a smarter way > to monitor this thing (e.g. a metric like taskManager_numKeys)? > > I also discovered that one cannot force how to partition keys per taskmanager > (i.e. use keyBy after a customPartition). Is there any development effort in > this direction? > > Best, > Flavio > > [1]https://github.com/apache/flink-playgrounds/blob/master/docker/ops-playground-image/java/flink-playground-clickcountjob/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/playgrounds/ops/clickcount/ClickEventCount.java > > <https://github.com/apache/flink-playgrounds/blob/master/docker/ops-playground-image/java/flink-playground-clickcountjob/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/playgrounds/ops/clickcount/ClickEventCount.java>