Hi Fabian,

the mirror is
https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/flink/flink-1.6.1/flink-1.6.1-bin-scala_2.11.tgz

I just tried a download and the hash is still wrong: it should be

d0153bad859e3c2da7e73299837f95670279b3102a0982809f56eb61875908a10120e82bc2dca59972e912c0221cbbfd01f4cd1128a92dd37358e28fe1f76f2f

but instead it's

9b4ceb7ad59df27ea4c12d15845165dcf64675a26161d502d399234ae237f40f719ab6da4fac7ba210a20aa82364b5ac0377b06a1324e21516198b7a23b5d19c

Best regards,
Gianluca


On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 at 11:59, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Gianluca,
>
> I tried to validate the issue but hash and signature are OK for me.
>
> Do you remember which mirror you used to download the binaries?
>
> Best, Fabian
>
>
> Am Sa., 29. Sep. 2018 um 17:24 Uhr schrieb vino yang <
> yanghua1...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi Gianluca,
>>
>> This is very strange, Till may be able to give an explanation, because it
>> is the release manager of this version.
>>
>> Thanks, vino.
>>
>> Gianluca Ortelli <gianl...@mediadistillery.com> 于2018年9月28日周五 下午4:02写道:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I just downloaded flink-1.6.1-bin-scala_2.11.tgz from
>>> https://flink.apache.org/downloads.html and noticed that it fails
>>> signature verification with a
>>>
>>> gpg: BAD signature from "Till Rohrmann (stsffap) <trohrm...@apache.org>"
>>>
>>> message. The sha512 hash doesn't match either.
>>>
>>> I switched to 1.6.0, which verifies OK.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Gianluca
>>>
>>

Reply via email to