Thanks, Dawid.

On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 12:48 PM, Dawid Wysakowicz <dwysakow...@apache.org>
wrote:

> Hi Shailesh,
>
> It does not emit results because "followedBy" accepts only the first
> occurrence of matching event. Therefore in your case it only tries to
> construct pattern with start(id=2). Try removing this event and you will
> see it matches the other one.
> If you want to try to construct match with any subsequent start you can
> use "followedByAny", but then remember to add the within clause, as
> otherwise partial matches won't be cleared.
>
> Cheers,
> Dawid
>
> On 25/06/18 08:11, Shailesh Jain wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to detect a sequence like A followed by B, C, D.
> > i.e. there is no strict contiguity between A and B, but strict
> > contiguity between B, C and D.
> >
> > Sample test case:
> > https://gist.github.com/jainshailesh/57832683fb5137bd306e4844abd9ef86
> >
> > testStrictFollowedByRelaxedContiguity passes, but
> > testRelaxedFollowedByStrictContiguity fails.
> >
> > I'm not able to understand this behaviour. Am I missing something here?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Shailesh
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to