Thanks, Dawid. On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 12:48 PM, Dawid Wysakowicz <dwysakow...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Shailesh, > > It does not emit results because "followedBy" accepts only the first > occurrence of matching event. Therefore in your case it only tries to > construct pattern with start(id=2). Try removing this event and you will > see it matches the other one. > If you want to try to construct match with any subsequent start you can > use "followedByAny", but then remember to add the within clause, as > otherwise partial matches won't be cleared. > > Cheers, > Dawid > > On 25/06/18 08:11, Shailesh Jain wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm trying to detect a sequence like A followed by B, C, D. > > i.e. there is no strict contiguity between A and B, but strict > > contiguity between B, C and D. > > > > Sample test case: > > https://gist.github.com/jainshailesh/57832683fb5137bd306e4844abd9ef86 > > > > testStrictFollowedByRelaxedContiguity passes, but > > testRelaxedFollowedByStrictContiguity fails. > > > > I'm not able to understand this behaviour. Am I missing something here? > > > > Thanks, > > Shailesh > > > > > > > > > >
