Hi, In my understanding this is the expected behaviour of the code. The only way to shut down the Emitter is via an interrupt because it is otherwise blocking on the queue. If the Emitter had been interrupted while the operator is still running it would have gone down a different code path: https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/40cec17f4303b43bbf65d8be542f0646eada57e8/flink-streaming-java/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/api/operators/async/Emitter.java#L89
Did you see any other faulty behaviour or only this log message. Best, Aljoscha > On 6. Oct 2017, at 18:17, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Ken, > > I don't have much experience with streaming iterations. > Maybe Aljoscha (in CC) has an idea what is happening and if it can be > prevented. > > Best, Fabian > > 2017-10-05 1:33 GMT+02:00 Ken Krugler <kkrugler_li...@transpac.com > <mailto:kkrugler_li...@transpac.com>>: > Hi all, > > I’ve got a streaming topology with an iteration, and a RichAsyncFunction in > that iteration. > > When the iteration terminates due to no activity, I see this message in the > logs: > > 17/10/04 16:01:36 DEBUG async.Emitter:91 - Emitter thread got interrupted. > This indicates that the emitter should shut down. > java.lang.InterruptedException > at > java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.reportInterruptAfterWait(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2014) > at > java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2048) > at > org.apache.flink.streaming.api.operators.async.queue.UnorderedStreamElementQueue.peekBlockingly(UnorderedStreamElementQueue.java:147) > at > org.apache.flink.streaming.api.operators.async.Emitter.run(Emitter.java:82) > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) > > I read through https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5638 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5638>, which makes me wonder if > there’s a different but related issue involving an async function in an > iteration. > > Or perhaps I need to do something in my RichAsyncFunction to avoid this > situation? > > Or is this expected and just the way things are currently? > > Just FYI, my topology is here: > https://s3.amazonaws.com/su-public/flink-crawler+topology.pdf > <https://s3.amazonaws.com/su-public/flink-crawler+topology.pdf> > > Thanks, > > — Ken > > -------------------------- > Ken Krugler > +1 530-210-6378 <tel:(530)%20210-6378> > http://www.scaleunlimited.com <http://www.scaleunlimited.com/> > custom big data solutions & training > Hadoop, Cascading, Cassandra & Solr > >
