+1 for dropping Java 1.7. On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Kurt Young <ykt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 for droppint Java 7, we have been using Java 8 for more than one year > in Alibaba and everything work fine. > > Best, > Kurt > > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 2:53 AM, Bowen Li <bowen...@offerupnow.com> wrote: > >> +1 for dropping Java 7 >> >> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Gyula Fóra <gyula.f...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > +1 for dropping 1.7 from me as well. >> > >> > Gyula >> > >> > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017, 17:53 Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > +1 on dropping support for Java 1.7 >> > > >> > > -------- Original message -------- >> > > From: Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> >> > > Date: 7/12/17 8:36 AM (GMT-08:00) >> > > To: d...@flink.apache.org >> > > Cc: user <user@flink.apache.org> >> > > Subject: Re: [POLL] Who still uses Java 7 with Flink ? >> > > >> > > +1 to drop Java 7 support >> > > >> > > I believe that we can move to Java 8 for the argument you've stated. >> > > ElasticSearch 5, Spark 2.2 require Java 8 already, Hadoop 3.0.0 will >> > > require it as well. >> > > >> > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Driesprong, Fokko >> <fo...@driesprong.frl >> > > >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > >> Hi, >> > >> >> > >> I would be in favor of dropping Java 7 as we don't use it in our >> hadoop >> > >> infra (and we are a bank). Also, Spark 2.2 has been released today, >> > >> which doesn't >> > >> support Java 7 <http://spark.apache.org/releases/spark-release-2-2-0 >> . >> > html >> > >> > >> > >> anymore, and Flink should not lack behind :-) >> > >> >> > >> Cheers, Fokko >> > >> >> > >> 2017-07-12 15:56 GMT+02:00 Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>: >> > >> >> > >> > Bumping this thread again. >> > >> > >> > >> > There are several strong points for dropping Java 7 support, apart >> > from >> > >> the >> > >> > fact that it is not maintained >> > >> > >> > >> > - We could really use the Java 8 default methods feature in >> > >> interfaces to >> > >> > evolve the API without breaking backwards compatibility >> > >> > >> > >> > - Easier build setup for Scala 2.12 (which requires Java 8), no >> need >> > >> to >> > >> > manage the tricky combinations of Java / Scala versions >> > >> > >> > >> > - Ability to use vanilla Akka (rather than Flakka) which requires >> > >> Java 8. >> > >> > - Fewer problems for users that use Akka in the Flink >> applications >> > >> > - Flakka currently does not support Scala 2.12 >> > >> > - Newer Akka versions shade protobuf, which is important >> > >> > >> > >> > I think these together make a pretty good case for bumping the >> > required >> > >> > Java version to Java 8. >> > >> > >> > >> > It would just help both Flink users (dependency management, Scala >> > >> versions) >> > >> > and developers (build simplification) a lot. >> > >> > Unless we see users stepping forward and making a case that it >> will be >> > >> > impossible for them to upgrade to Java 8, I suggest to go forward >> with >> > >> > this. >> > >> > >> > >> > Best, >> > >> > Stephan >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 9:36 PM, Haohui Mai <ricet...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > > +1 >> > >> > > >> > >> > > There are several high impacts security vulnerabilities in JDK 7 >> and >> > >> will >> > >> > > not be addressed. >> > >> > > >> > >> > > As a result we completely moved away from JDK 7. >> > >> > > >> > >> > > +1 on separating the tasks of supporting Scala 2.12 and JDK 8 in >> two >> > >> > steps. >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 9:53 AM Greg Hogan <c...@greghogan.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > >> > >> > > > Is this not two different issues? >> > >> > > > - adding builds for Scala 2.12 >> > >> > > > - upgrading to Java version 1.8 >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > It may be time to switch, but I haven’t seen anything in >> > FLINK-5005 >> > >> > which >> > >> > > > prevents simply adding Scala 2.12 to our supported build matrix >> > and >> > >> > > > continuing to build 2.10 / 2.11 against Java 1.7. >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > Greg >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > > On Jun 8, 2017, at 11:39 AM, Robert Metzger < >> > rmetz...@apache.org> >> > >> > > wrote: >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > Hi all, >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > as promised in March, I want to revive this discussion! >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > Our users are begging for Scala 2.12 support [1], migration >> to >> > >> Akka >> > >> > 2.4 >> > >> > > > would solve a bunch of shading / dependency issues (Akka 2.4 >> will >> > >> > remove >> > >> > > > Akka's protobuf dependency [2][3]) and generally Java 8's new >> > >> language >> > >> > > > features all speak for dropping Java 7. >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > Java 8 has been released in March, 2014. Java 7 is >> unsupported >> > >> since >> > >> > > > June 2016. >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > So what's the feeling in the community regarding the step? >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5005# < >> > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5005#> >> > >> > > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5989 < >> > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5989> >> > >> > > > > [3] >> > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3211? >> > >> > > focusedCommentId=15274018&page=com.atlassian.jira. >> > >> > > plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15274018 >> > >> > > > < >> > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3211? >> > >> > > focusedCommentId=15274018&page=com.atlassian.jira. >> > >> > > plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15274018 >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Theodore Vasiloudis < >> > >> > > > theodoros.vasilou...@gmail.com <mailto: >> > >> theodoros.vasilou...@gmail.com >> > >> > >> >> > >> > > > wrote: >> > >> > > > > Hello all, >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > I'm sure you've considered this already, but what this data >> does >> > >> not >> > >> > > > include is all the potential future users, >> > >> > > > > i.e. slower moving organizations (banks etc.) which could be >> on >> > >> Java >> > >> > 7 >> > >> > > > still. >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > Whether those are relevant is up for debate. >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > Cheers, >> > >> > > > > Theo >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Robert Metzger < >> > >> > rmetz...@apache.org >> > >> > > > <mailto:rmetz...@apache.org>> wrote: >> > >> > > > > Yeah, you are right :) >> > >> > > > > I'll put something in my calendar for end of May. >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Greg Hogan < >> > c...@greghogan.com >> > >> > > > <mailto:c...@greghogan.com>> wrote: >> > >> > > > > Robert, >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > Thanks for the report. Shouldn’t we be revisiting this >> decision >> > at >> > >> > the >> > >> > > > beginning of the new release cycle rather than near the end? >> There >> > >> is >> > >> > > > currently little cost to staying with Java 7 since no Flink >> code >> > or >> > >> > pull >> > >> > > > requests have been written for Java 8. >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > Greg >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> On Mar 23, 2017, at 6:37 AM, Robert Metzger < >> > rmetz...@apache.org >> > >> > > > <mailto:rmetz...@apache.org>> wrote: >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> Looks like 9% on twitter and 24% on the mailing list are >> still >> > >> using >> > >> > > > Java 7. >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> I would vote to keep supporting Java 7 for Flink 1.3 and >> then >> > >> > revisit >> > >> > > > once we are approaching 1.4 in September. >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Bowen Li < >> > >> bowen...@offerupnow.com >> > >> > > > <mailto:bowen...@offerupnow.com>> wrote: >> > >> > > > >> There's always a tradeoff we need to make. I'm in favor of >> > >> upgrading >> > >> > > to >> > >> > > > Java 8 to bring in all new Java features. >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> The common way I've seen (and I agree) other software >> upgrading >> > >> > major >> > >> > > > things like this is 1) upgrade for next big release without >> > backward >> > >> > > > compatibility and notify everyone 2) maintain and patch >> current, >> > >> > old-tech >> > >> > > > compatible version at a reasonably limited scope. Building >> > backward >> > >> > > > compatibility is too much for an open sourced project >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 7:10 AM, Robert Metzger < >> > >> > rmetz...@apache.org >> > >> > > > <mailto:rmetz...@apache.org>> wrote: >> > >> > > > >> I've put it also on our Twitter account: >> > >> > > > >> https://twitter.com/ApacheFlink/status/842015062667755521 < >> > >> > > > https://twitter.com/ApacheFlink/status/842015062667755521> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Martin Neumann < >> > >> > martin.neum...@ri.se >> > >> > > > <mailto:martin.neum...@ri.se>> >> > >> > > > >> wrote: >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> > I think this easier done in a straw poll than in an email >> > >> > > > conversation. >> > >> > > > >> > I created one at: http://www.strawpoll.me/12535073 < >> > >> > > > http://www.strawpoll.me/12535073> >> > >> > > > >> > (Note that you have multiple choices.) >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > Though I prefer Java 8 most of the time I have to work on >> > Java >> > >> 7. >> > >> > A >> > >> > > > lot of >> > >> > > > >> > the infrastructure I work on still runs Java 7, one of the >> > >> > > companies I >> > >> > > > >> > build a prototype for a while back just updated to Java 7 >> 2 >> > >> years >> > >> > > > ago. I >> > >> > > > >> > doubt we can ditch Java 7 support any time soon if we >> want to >> > >> make >> > >> > > it >> > >> > > > easy >> > >> > > > >> > for companies to use Flink. >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > cheers Martin >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > //PS sorry if this gets sent twice, we just migrated to a >> new >> > >> mail >> > >> > > > system >> > >> > > > >> > and a lot of things are broken >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > ________________________________ >> > >> > > > >> > From: Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org <mailto: >> > se...@apache.org >> > >> >> >> > >> > > > >> > Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2017 12:30:24 PM >> > >> > > > >> > To: user@flink.apache.org <mailto:user@flink.apache.org>; >> > >> > > > d...@flink.apache.org <mailto:d...@flink.apache.org> >> > >> > > > >> > Subject: [POLL] Who still uses Java 7 with Flink ? >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > Hi all! >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > I would like to get a feeling how much Java 7 is still >> being >> > >> used >> > >> > > > among >> > >> > > > >> > Flink users. >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > At some point, it would be great to drop Java 7 support >> and >> > >> make >> > >> > use >> > >> > > > of >> > >> > > > >> > Java 8's new features, but first we would need to get a >> > feeling >> > >> > how >> > >> > > > much >> > >> > > > >> > Java 7 is still used. >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > Would be happy if users on Java 7 respond here, or even >> users >> > >> that >> > >> > > > have >> > >> > > > >> > some insights into how widespread they think Java 7 still >> is. >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > > > >> > Stephan >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > --
