Hi, It's the reason why I gave up use Flink for my current project and pick up traditional Hadoop Framework again.
2017-02-17 10:56 GMT+08:00 Renjie Liu <liurenjie2...@gmail.com>: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP- > 1+%3A+Fine+Grained+Recovery+from+Task+Failures > This FLIP may help. > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 7:34 PM Anton Solovev <anton_solo...@epam.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Aljoscha, >> >> Could you share your plans of resolving it? >> >> >> >> Best, >> >> Anton >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* Aljoscha Krettek [mailto:aljos...@apache.org] >> *Sent:* Thursday, February 16, 2017 2:48 PM >> *To:* user@flink.apache.org >> *Subject:* Re: Flink batch processing fault tolerance >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> yes, this is indeed true. We had some plans for how to resolve this but >> they never materialised because of the focus on Stream Processing. We might >> unite the two in the future and then you will get fault-tolerant >> batch/stream processing in the same API. >> >> >> >> Best, >> >> Aljoscha >> >> >> >> On Wed, 15 Feb 2017 at 09:28 Renjie Liu <liurenjie2...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, all: >> I'm learning flink's doc and curious about the fault tolerance of batch >> process jobs. It seems that when one of task execution fails, the whole job >> will be restarted, is it true? If so, isn't it impractical to deploy large >> flink batch jobs? >> >> -- >> >> Liu, Renjie >> >> Software Engineer, MVAD >> >> -- > Liu, Renjie > Software Engineer, MVAD > -- Best regards Sili Liu