There are several JIRA issues for row windows, some of them might be
assigned.
I haven't seen pull requests and nothing to merged yet.

I would ask on the JIRA issue of the current status.

Best, Fabian

2017-01-05 12:00 GMT+01:00 Hongyuhong <hongyuh...@huawei.com>:

> Hi Fabian,
>
>
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> As you noticed, row windows are already supported by Calcite and FLIP-11
> has planned,
>
> Can you tell something about the progress of the row windows in Table API?
>
>
>
> Regards.
>
> Yuhong
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *发件人:* Fabian Hueske [mailto:fhue...@gmail.com]
> *发送时间:* 2017年1月5日 17:43
> *收件人:* user@flink.apache.org
> *主题:* Re: Som question about Flink stream sql
>
>
>
> Hi Yuhong,
>
> as you noticed, FLIP-11 is about the window operations on the Table API
> and does not include SQL.
>
> The reason is that the Table API is completely Flink domain, i.e., we can
> design and implement the API. For SQL we have a dependency on Calcite.
>
> You are right, that Calcite's JIRA issue for group windows [1] seems to be
> stale. I don't have more information on that. You could ping there and ask
> what the status is.
>
> Row windows are already supported by Calcite (SQL's OVER and WINDOW
> clauses), so these could be implemented for SQL as well.
>
> Maybe it's even easier to start from the SQL side and add the Table API
> later to ensure a compatible compilation process.
>
> Best, Fabian
>
>
>
>
>
> 2017-01-05 4:40 GMT+01:00 Hongyuhong <hongyuh...@huawei.com>:
>
> Hi,
>
> We are currently exploring on Flink streamsql ,
>
> And I see the group-window has been implemented in Table API, and
> row-window is also planning in FLIP-11. It seems that row-window grammar is
> more similar to calcite over clause.
>
> I’m curious about the detail plan and roadmap of stream sql, cause
> FLIP-11 just mentioned Table API.
>
> And is that streamsql priority implement row-window? Or if group-window is
> considered, what is the status on calcite integration?
>
> The issue on calcite jira was raised in August, what’s the status right
> now?
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Yuhong
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to