Could be. I had thought TypeInfoParser was closely related to TypeExtractor.

On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Wouldn't that be orthogonal to adding it to the TypeInfoParser?
>
> 2016-10-27 15:22 GMT+02:00 Greg Hogan <c...@greghogan.com>:
>
>> Fabian,
>>
>> Should we instead add this as a registered TypeInfoFactory?
>>
>> Greg
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 3:55 AM, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, I think you are right.
>>> TypeInfoParser needs to be extended to parse the java.sql.* types into
>>> the corresponding TypeInfos.
>>>
>>> Can you open a JIRA for that?
>>>
>>> Thanks, Fabian
>>>
>>> 2016-10-27 9:31 GMT+02:00 Radu Tudoran <radu.tudo...@huawei.com>:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I dig meanwhile more through this and I think I found a bug actually.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The scenario that I was trying to describe was something like
>>>>
>>>> 1.       You have a generic datastream with Tuple (alternatively I
>>>> could move to row I guess) and you get the data from whatever stream (e.g.,
>>>> kafka, network socket…)
>>>>
>>>> 2.       In the map/flat map function you parse and instantiate the
>>>> tuple generically
>>>>
>>>> 3.       In the “returns()” function of the map you enforce the types
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> DataStream<Tuple> = env.socketTextStream(…)
>>>>
>>>>                                 .map(new mapFunction(){
>>>>
>>>>                                 Public Tuple map(String value){
>>>>
>>>>                                                 Tuple out  =
>>>> Tuple.getTupleClass(#)
>>>>
>>>>                                                 …
>>>>
>>>> out.setField(SqlTimeTypeInfo.TIMESTAMP,0)
>>>>
>>>> …
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> }}) .returns(“Tuple#<java.sql.TIMESTAMP,…>”);
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The problem is that if you rely on the type extraction mechanism called
>>>> after the returns to recognize TIMESTAMP of type SqlTimeTypeInfo it will
>>>> not happen but instead a GenericType<TIMESTAMP> will be created.
>>>>
>>>> It looks like the type parsers were not extended to consider this types
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dr. Radu Tudoran
>>>>
>>>> Senior Research Engineer - Big Data Expert
>>>>
>>>> IT R&D Division
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [image: cid:image007.jpg@01CD52EB.AD060EE0]
>>>>
>>>> HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES Duesseldorf GmbH
>>>>
>>>> European Research Center
>>>>
>>>> Riesstrasse 25, 80992 München
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> E-mail: *radu.tudo...@huawei.com <radu.tudo...@huawei.com>*
>>>>
>>>> Mobile: +49 15209084330
>>>>
>>>> Telephone: +49 891588344173
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES Duesseldorf GmbH
>>>> Hansaallee 205, 40549 Düsseldorf, Germany, www.huawei.com
>>>> Registered Office: Düsseldorf, Register Court Düsseldorf, HRB 56063,
>>>> Managing Director: Bo PENG, Wanzhou MENG, Lifang CHEN
>>>> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Düsseldorf, Amtsgericht Düsseldorf, HRB 56063,
>>>> Geschäftsführer: Bo PENG, Wanzhou MENG, Lifang CHEN
>>>>
>>>> This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from
>>>> HUAWEI, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is
>>>> listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way
>>>> (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction,
>>>> or dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is
>>>> prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender
>>>> by phone or email immediately and delete it!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Fabian Hueske [mailto:fhue...@gmail.com]
>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 26, 2016 10:11 PM
>>>> *To:* user@flink.apache.org
>>>> *Subject:* Re: TIMESTAMP TypeInformation
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Radu,
>>>>
>>>> I might not have complete understood your problem, but if you do
>>>>
>>>> val env = StreamExecutionEnvironment.getExecutionEnvironment
>>>> val tEnv = TableEnvironment.getTableEnvironment(env)
>>>>
>>>> val ds = env.fromElements( (1, 1L, new Time(1,2,3)) )
>>>> val t = ds.toTable(tEnv, 'a, 'b, 'c)
>>>>
>>>> val results = t
>>>>     .select('c + 10.seconds)
>>>>
>>>> then field 'c will be of type SqlTimeTypeInfo and handled as such.
>>>>
>>>> Hope this helps,
>>>>
>>>> Fabian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2016-10-25 17:32 GMT+02:00 Radu Tudoran <radu.tudo...@huawei.com>:
>>>>
>>>> Re-hi,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I actually realized that the problem comes from the fact that the
>>>> datastream that I am registering does not create properly the types.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am using something like
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> DataStream<Tuple> … .returns(“TupleX<,….,java.sql.Timestamp,
>>>> java.sql.Time>”)…and I was expecting that these will be converted to
>>>> SqlTimeTypeInfo…but it is converted to GenericType. Anythoughts how I could
>>>> force the type to be recognize as a SqlTimeType?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Radu Tudoran
>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 25, 2016 4:46 PM
>>>> *To:* 'user@flink.apache.org'
>>>> *Subject:* TIMESTAMP TypeInformation
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I would like to create a TIMESTAMP type from the data schema. I would
>>>> need this to match against the FlinkTypeFactory (toTypeInfo())
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *def* toTypeInfo(relDataType: RelDataType): TypeInformation[_] =
>>>> relDataType.getSqlTypeName *match* {
>>>>
>>>>     *case* BOOLEAN => BOOLEAN_TYPE_INFO
>>>>
>>>>     *case* TINYINT => BYTE_TYPE_INFO
>>>>
>>>>     *case* SMALLINT => SHORT_TYPE_INFO
>>>>
>>>>     *case* INTEGER => INT_TYPE_INFO
>>>>
>>>>     *case* BIGINT => LONG_TYPE_INFO
>>>>
>>>>     *case* FLOAT => FLOAT_TYPE_INFO
>>>>
>>>>     *case* DOUBLE => DOUBLE_TYPE_INFO
>>>>
>>>>     *case* VARCHAR | CHAR => STRING_TYPE_INFO
>>>>
>>>>     *case* DECIMAL => BIG_DEC_TYPE_INFO
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     // date/time types
>>>>
>>>>     *case* DATE => SqlTimeTypeInfo.DATE
>>>>
>>>>     *case* TIME => SqlTimeTypeInfo.TIME
>>>>
>>>>     *case* *TIMESTAMP** => SqlTimeTypeInfo.**TIMESTAMP*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I tried to use create the TypeInformation by calling directly
>>>> SqlTimeTypeInfo.TIMESTAMP . However, it seems that
>>>> relDataType.getSqlTypeName match is of type ANY instead of being of type
>>>> TIMESTAMP.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Any thoughts of how to create the proper TIMESTAMP typeinformation?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to