Hi Aljoscha

We are not using state backend explicitly, recovery and state backend are 
pointed to file path.
See attached json file 

Thanks for the help.


Best regards


Andrew

> On 10 Aug 2016, at 11:38, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Oh, are you by any chance specifying a custom state backend for your job? For 
> example, RocksDBStateBackend.
> 
> Cheers,
> Aljoscha
> 
> On Wed, 10 Aug 2016 at 11:17 Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org 
> <mailto:aljos...@apache.org>> wrote:
> Hi,
> could you maybe send us the output of "env.getExecutionPlan()". This would 
> help us better understand which operators are used exactly. (You can of 
> course remove any security sensitive stuff.)
> 
> Cheers,
> Aljoscha
> 
> On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 at 15:30 Andrew Ge Wu <andrew.ge...@eniro.com 
> <mailto:andrew.ge...@eniro.com>> wrote:
> Oh sorry missed that part, no, Im not explicitly set that.
> 
> 
>> On 09 Aug 2016, at 15:29, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org 
>> <mailto:aljos...@apache.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> are you setting a StreamTimeCharacteristic, i.e. 
>> env.setStreamTimeCharacteristic?
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Aljoscha
>> 
>> On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 at 14:52 Andrew Ge Wu <andrew.ge...@eniro.com 
>> <mailto:andrew.ge...@eniro.com>> wrote:
>> Hi Aljoscha
>> 
>> 
>> Plan attached, there are split streams and union operations around, but here 
>> is how windows are created
>> 
>> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail transmission may contain confidential or 
>> legally privileged information that is intended only for the individual or 
>> entity named in the e-mail address. If you are not the intended recipient, 
>> you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or 
>> reliance upon the contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be 
>> unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the 
>> sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies of this message.
>> 
>> Let me know if I’m doing something out of ordinary here.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> 
>> Andrew
>>> On 09 Aug 2016, at 14:18, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org 
>>> <mailto:aljos...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>> 
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> could you maybe post how exactly you specify the window? Also, did you set 
>>> a "stream time characteristic", for example EventTime?
>>> 
>>> That could help us pinpoint the problem.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Aljoscha
>>> 
>> 
>>> On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 at 12:42 Andrew Ge Wu <andrew.ge...@eniro.com 
>>> <mailto:andrew.ge...@eniro.com>> wrote:
>> 
>>> I rolled back to 1.0.3
>> 
>>> If I understand this correctly, the peak when topology starts is because it 
>>> is trying to fill all the buffers, but I can not see that in 1.1.0.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>>>> On 09 Aug 2016, at 12:10, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org 
>>>> <mailto:rmetz...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Which source are you using?
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Andrew Ge Wu <andrew.ge...@eniro.com 
>>>> <mailto:andrew.ge...@eniro.com>> wrote:
>>>> Hi Robert
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks for the quick reply, I guess I’m one of the early birds.
>>>> Yes, it is much slower, I’m not sure why, I copied slaves, masters, 
>>>> log4j.properties and flink-conf.yaml directly from 1.0.3
>>>> I have parallelization 1 on my sources, I can increase that to achieve the 
>>>> same speed, but I’m interested to know why is that.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Andrew
>>>>> On 09 Aug 2016, at 11:47, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org 
>>>>> <mailto:rmetz...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Andrew,
>>>>> 
>>>>> here is the release announcement, with a list of all changes: 
>>>>> http://flink.apache.org/news/2016/08/08/release-1.1.0.html 
>>>>> <http://flink.apache.org/news/2016/08/08/release-1.1.0.html>, 
>>>>> http://flink.apache.org/blog/release_1.1.0-changelog.html 
>>>>> <http://flink.apache.org/blog/release_1.1.0-changelog.html>
>>>>> 
>>>>> What does the chart say? Are the results different? is Flink faster or 
>>>>> slower now?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Robert
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Andrew Ge Wu <andrew.ge...@eniro.com 
>>>>> <mailto:andrew.ge...@eniro.com>> wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> We found out there is a new stable version released: 1.1.0 but we can not 
>>>>> find any release note.
>>>>> Do anyone know where to find it?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> We are experience some change of behavior, I’m not sure if it is related.
>>>>> 
>>>>> <PastedGraphic-1.png>
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Andrew
>>>>> 
>>>>> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail transmission may contain confidential 
>>>>> or legally privileged information that is intended only for the 
>>>>> individual or entity named in the e-mail address. If you are not the 
>>>>> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, 
>>>>> distribution, or reliance upon the contents of this e-mail is strictly 
>>>>> prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in 
>>>>> error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete 
>>>>> all copies of this message.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail transmission may contain confidential 
>>>> or legally privileged information that is intended only for the individual 
>>>> or entity named in the e-mail address. If you are not the intended 
>>>> recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, 
>>>> distribution, or reliance upon the contents of this e-mail is strictly 
>>>> prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, 
>>>> please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all 
>>>> copies of this message.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail transmission may contain confidential 
>>> or legally privileged information that is intended only for the individual 
>>> or entity named in the e-mail address. If you are not the intended 
>>> recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, 
>>> distribution, or reliance upon the contents of this e-mail is strictly 
>>> prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, 
>>> please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies 
>>> of this message.
> 
> 
> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail transmission may contain confidential or 
> legally privileged information that is intended only for the individual or 
> entity named in the e-mail address. If you are not the intended recipient, 
> you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or 
> reliance upon the contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be 
> unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender 
> immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies of this message.


-- 
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail transmission may contain confidential 
or legally privileged information that is intended only for the individual 
or entity named in the e-mail address. If you are not the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, 
distribution, or reliance upon the contents of this e-mail is strictly 
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, 
please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies 
of this message.
Thanks for the help.


Best regards


Andrew

On 10 Aug 2016, at 11:38, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> wrote:

Oh, are you by any chance specifying a custom state backend for your job? For example, RocksDBStateBackend.

Cheers,
Aljoscha

On Wed, 10 Aug 2016 at 11:17 Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> wrote:
Hi,
could you maybe send us the output of "env.getExecutionPlan()". This would help us better understand which operators are used exactly. (You can of course remove any security sensitive stuff.)

Cheers,
Aljoscha

On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 at 15:30 Andrew Ge Wu <andrew.ge...@eniro.com> wrote:
Oh sorry missed that part, no, Im not explicitly set that.


On 09 Aug 2016, at 15:29, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> wrote:

Hi,
are you setting a StreamTimeCharacteristic, i.e. env.setStreamTimeCharacteristic?

Cheers,
Aljoscha

On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 at 14:52 Andrew Ge Wu <andrew.ge...@eniro.com> wrote:
Hi Aljoscha


Plan attached, there are split streams and union operations around, but here is how windows are created

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail transmission may contain confidential or legally privileged information that is intended only for the individual or entity named in the e-mail address. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or reliance upon the contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies of this message.

Let me know if I’m doing something out of ordinary here.



Thanks!


Andrew
On 09 Aug 2016, at 14:18, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> wrote:

Hi,
could you maybe post how exactly you specify the window? Also, did you set a "stream time characteristic", for example EventTime?

That could help us pinpoint the problem.

Cheers,
Aljoscha

On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 at 12:42 Andrew Ge Wu <andrew.ge...@eniro.com> wrote:
I rolled back to 1.0.3
If I understand this correctly, the peak when topology starts is because it is trying to fill all the buffers, but I can not see that in 1.1.0.



On 09 Aug 2016, at 12:10, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> wrote:

Which source are you using?

On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Andrew Ge Wu <andrew.ge...@eniro.com> wrote:
Hi Robert


Thanks for the quick reply, I guess I’m one of the early birds.
Yes, it is much slower, I’m not sure why, I copied slaves, masters, log4j.properties and flink-conf.yaml directly from 1.0.3
I have parallelization 1 on my sources, I can increase that to achieve the same speed, but I’m interested to know why is that.


Thanks!


Andrew
On 09 Aug 2016, at 11:47, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> wrote:

Hi Andrew,


What does the chart say? Are the results different? is Flink faster or slower now?


Regards,
Robert

On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Andrew Ge Wu <andrew.ge...@eniro.com> wrote:
Hi,

We found out there is a new stable version released: 1.1.0 but we can not find any release note.
Do anyone know where to find it?


We are experience some change of behavior, I’m not sure if it is related.

<PastedGraphic-1.png>

Thanks


Andrew

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail transmission may contain confidential or legally privileged information that is intended only for the individual or entity named in the e-mail address. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or reliance upon the contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies of this message.



Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail transmission may contain confidential or legally privileged information that is intended only for the individual or entity named in the e-mail address. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or reliance upon the contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies of this message.


Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail transmission may contain confidential or legally privileged information that is intended only for the individual or entity named in the e-mail address. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or reliance upon the contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies of this message.


Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail transmission may contain confidential or legally privileged information that is intended only for the individual or entity named in the e-mail address. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or reliance upon the contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies of this message.

Attachment: plan.json
Description: application/json

Reply via email to