Hi, I might lead to flooding, yes. But I'm afraid it's the only way to go right now.
Cheers, Aljoscha On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 at 17:57 Biplob Biswas <revolutioni...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I was afraid of buffering because I am not sure when the second map > function > would get data, wouldn't the first map be flooded with data while the > second > map gets data? > > Is it viable because the first stream is a stream of continuous data and > the > second stream gets data after some time and not as fast as the first one. > > Thanks for replying though, will try that out. > > Regards > Biplob Biswas > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/Way-to-hold-execution-of-one-of-the-map-operator-in-Co-FlatMaps-tp7689p7699.html > Sent from the Apache Flink User Mailing List archive. mailing list archive > at Nabble.com. >
