Ok..great to hear that!

Thanks to all for the support

On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote:

> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > I think it might just be a warning. When using Kryo it is in the end a
> > GenericTypeInformation but the TypeAnalyzer might still initially try to
> > analyze it as a POJO.
>
> Yes, that's correct.
>
> To get back at the initial question: it's safe to ignore it then. ;)
>

Reply via email to