There is a Scaladoc but it is not covering all packages, unfortunately. In
the Scala API you can call transform without specifying a TypeInformation,
it works using implicits/context bounds.

On Tue, 3 May 2016 at 01:48 Srikanth <srikanth...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Sorry for the previous incomplete email. Didn't realize I hit send!
>
> I was facing a weird compilation error in Scala when I did
> val joinedStream = stream1.connect(stream2)
> .transform("funName", outTypeInfo, joinOperator)
>
> It turned out to be due to a difference in API signature between Scala and
> Java API. I was refering to javadoc. Is there a scaladoc?
>
> Java API has
> public <R> SingleOutputStreamOperator<R> transform(
>                         String functionName,
> TypeInformation<R> outTypeInfo,
> TwoInputStreamOperator<IN1, IN2, R> operator)
>
> Scala API has
> def transform[R: TypeInformation](
>       functionName: String,
>       operator: TwoInputStreamOperator[IN1, IN2, R])
>
> Srikanth
>
> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 7:18 PM, Srikanth <srikanth...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm fac
>>
>> val stream = env.addSource(new FlinkKafkaConsumer09[String]("test-topic",
>> new SimpleStringSchema(), properties))
>> val bidderStream: KeyedStream[BidderRawLogs, Int] = stream.flatMap(b =>
>> BidderRawLogs(b)).keyBy(b => b.strategyId)
>>
>> val metaStrategy: KeyedStream[(Int, String), Int] =
>> env.readTextFile("path").name("Strategy")
>>  .map((1, _) ).keyBy(_._1)
>>
>> val staticTypeInfo = new TypeHint[(Int, String)]() {}.getTypeInfo()
>> val dynamicTypeInfo = new TypeHint[BidderRawLogs]() {}.getTypeInfo()
>> val joinOperator: TwoInputStreamOperator[BidderRawLogs, (Int, String),
>> (Int, BidderRawLogs, (Int, String))] =
>>  new JoinOperator[Int, BidderRawLogs, (Int, String)] (dynamicTypeInfo,
>> staticTypeInfo)
>> val outTypeInfo = new TypeHint[(Int, BidderRawLogs, (Int, String))]()
>> {}.getTypeInfo()
>>
>> val funName = "test"
>> val joinedStream = bidderStream.connect(metaStrategy)
>> .transform(funName, joinOperator, outTypeInfo)
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to