On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> wrote: > IMHO the only change for 2) is that you possibly get better machine > utilization because it will use more parallel threads. So I think it’s a > valid approach. > > @Ufuk, could there be problems with the number of network buffers? I think > not, because the connections are multiplexed in one channel, is this correct?
I would not expect it to become a problem. If it does, it's easy to resolve by throwing a little more memory at the problem. [1] – Ufuk [1] https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-master/setup/config.html#configuring-the-network-buffers
