Hi Rico,
are you generating the data directly in your flink program or some external
queue, such as Kafka?

Cheers,
Aljoscha

On Thu, 24 Sep 2015 at 13:47 Rico Bergmann <i...@ricobergmann.de> wrote:

> And as side note:
>
> The problem with duplicates seems also to be solved!
>
> Cheers Rico.
>
>
>
> Am 24.09.2015 um 12:21 schrieb Rico Bergmann <i...@ricobergmann.de>:
>
> I took a first glance.
>
> I ran 2 test setups. One with a limited test data generator, the outputs
> around 200 events per second. In this setting the new implementation keeps
> up with the incoming message rate.
>
> The other setup had an unlimited generation (at highest possible rate).
> There the same problem as before can be observed. After 2 minutes runtime
> the output of my program is more than a minute behind ... And increasing
> over time. But I don't know whether this could be a setup problem. I
> noticed the os load of my testsystem was around 90%. So it might be more a
> setup problem ...
>
> Thanks for your support so far.
>
> Cheers. Rico.
>
>
>
>
>
> Am 24.09.2015 um 09:33 schrieb Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org>:
>
> Hi Rico,
> you should be able to get it with these steps:
>
> git clone https://github.com/StephanEwen/incubator-flink.git flink
> cd flink
> git checkout -t origin/windows
>
> This will get you on Stephan's windowing branch. Then you can do a
>
> mvn clean install -DskipTests
>
> to build it.
>
> I will merge his stuff later today, then you should also be able to use it
> by running the 0.10-SNAPSHOT version.
>
> Cheers,
> Aljoscha
>
>
> On Thu, 24 Sep 2015 at 09:11 Rico Bergmann <i...@ricobergmann.de> wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Sounds great. How can I get the source code before it's merged to the
>> master branch? Unfortunately I only have 2 days left for trying this out ...
>>
>> Greets. Rico.
>>
>>
>>
>> Am 24.09.2015 um 00:57 schrieb Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>:
>>
>> Hi Rico!
>>
>> We have finished the first part of the Window API reworks. You can find
>> the code here: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1175
>>
>> It should fix the issues and offer vastly improved performance (up to 50x
>> faster). For now, it supports time windows, but we will support the other
>> cases in the next days.
>>
>> I'll ping you once it is merged, I'd be curious if it fixes your issue.
>> Sorry that you ran into this problem...
>>
>> Greetings,
>> Stephan
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Rico Bergmann <i...@ricobergmann.de>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> While working with grouping and windowing I encountered a strange
>>> behavior. I'm doing:
>>>
>>> dataStream.groupBy(KeySelector).window(Time.of(x,
>>> TimeUnit.SECONDS)).mapWindow(toString).flatten()
>>>
>>>
>>> When I run the program containing this snippet it initially outputs data
>>> at a rate around 150 events per sec. (That is roughly the input rate for
>>> the program). After about 10-30 minutes the rate drops down below 5 events
>>> per sec. This leads to event delivery offsets getting bigger and bigger ...
>>>
>>> Any explanation for this? I know you are reworking the streaming API.
>>> But it would be useful to know, why this happens ...
>>>
>>> Cheers. Rico.
>>>
>>
>>

Reply via email to