You are right, Arnaud. Sorry about this. :( I'm pushing a fix right now (for
0.9.1 as well)). Thanks for reporting this!
On 16 Jul 2015, at 16:22, LINZ, Arnaud <al...@bouyguestelecom.fr> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> According to the documentation, getIndexOfThisSubtask starts from 1;
>
> /**
> * Gets the number of the parallel subtask. The numbering starts from
> 1 and goes up to the parallelism,
> * as returned by {@link #getNumberOfParallelSubtasks()}.
> *
> * @return The number of the parallel subtask.
> */
> int getIndexOfThisSubtask();
>
> but in my code in 0.9.0 it starts at 0 and goes up to
> getNumberOfParallelSubtasks()-1
>
> I suppose that the doc is wrong, then.
>
> Best regards,
> Arnaud
>
> ________________________________
>
> L'intégrité de ce message n'étant pas assurée sur internet, la société
> expéditrice ne peut être tenue responsable de son contenu ni de ses pièces
> jointes. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autorisée est interdite. Si vous
> n'êtes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le détruire et d'avertir
> l'expéditeur.
>
> The integrity of this message cannot be guaranteed on the Internet. The
> company that sent this message cannot therefore be held liable for its
> content nor attachments. Any unauthorized use or dissemination is prohibited.
> If you are not the intended recipient of this message, then please delete it
> and notify the sender.
