Okay, it seems like we have consensus on this. Who is interested in working on this? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2200
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 1:26 AM, Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 for giving only those modules a version suffix which depend on Scala. > > > On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 8:03 PM Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> There was already a discussion regarding the two options here [1], back >> then we had a majority for giving all modules a scala suffix. >> >> I'm against giving all modules a suffix because we force our users to >> migrate the name and its confusing for Java users (I was confused myself >> when I was trying out Spark two years ago (back then I didn't know anything >> about Scala ;) )) >> >> [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/477#issuecomment-82266786 >> >> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 3:47 AM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> Good idea, Chiwan! >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Chiwan Park <chiwanp...@icloud.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi. I think that we don’t need deploy all modules with scala variation. >>>> The pure java-based modules such as flink-java, flink-core, >>>> flink-optimizers, …, etc. don’t need to be deployed with scala version >>>> variation. We need only scala related modules such as flink-ml, >>>> flink-runtime, flink-scala, …, etc. with version variation. >>>> >>>> So we can reduce a number of deployed modules. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Chiwan Park >>>> >>>> > On Jun 13, 2015, at 9:17 AM, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > I agree that we should ship a 2.11 build of Flink if downstream >>>> projects need that. >>>> > >>>> > The only thing that we should keep in mind when doing this is that >>>> the number of jars we're pushing to maven will explode (but that is fine) >>>> > We have currently 46 maven modules and we would create 4 versions of >>>> each of the modules (hd1,hd2 x scala210,scala211) so we end up with 184 >>>> jars per release ;) >>>> > >>>> > The other big question that I have regarding this is how we want to >>>> name the modules. >>>> > We could add the scala version to all the modules, like >>>> "flink-java_2.10", which would mean that users have to change a bit more >>>> when upgrading to the release supporting different scala versions. >>>> > >>>> > If we all agree on that, we can move on changing our maven setup. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Kostas Tzoumas <ktzou...@apache.org> >>>> wrote: >>>> > Please do ping this list if you encounter any problems with Flink >>>> during your project (you have done so already :-), but also if you find >>>> that the Flink API needs additions to map Pig well to Flink >>>> > >>>> > On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Philipp Goetze < >>>> philipp.goe...@tu-ilmenau.de> wrote: >>>> > Done. Can be found here: >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2200 >>>> > >>>> > Best Regards, >>>> > Philipp >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On 10.06.2015 15:29, Chiwan Park wrote: >>>> > But I think uploading Flink API with scala 2.11 to maven repository >>>> is nice idea. >>>> > Could you create a JIRA issue? >>>> > >>>> > Regards, >>>> > Chiwan Park >>>> > >>>> > On Jun 10, 2015, at 10:23 PM, Chiwan Park <chiwanp...@icloud.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > No. Currently, there are no Flink binaries with scala 2.11 which are >>>> downloadable. >>>> > >>>> > Regards, >>>> > Chiwan Park >>>> > >>>> > On Jun 10, 2015, at 10:18 PM, Philipp Goetze < >>>> philipp.goe...@tu-ilmenau.de> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > Thank you Chiwan! >>>> > >>>> > I did not know the master has a 2.11 profile. >>>> > >>>> > But there is no pre-built Flink with 2.11, which I could refer to in >>>> sbt or maven, is it? >>>> > >>>> > Best Regards, >>>> > Philipp >>>> > >>>> > On 10.06.2015 15:03, Chiwan Park wrote: >>>> > Hi. You can build Flink with Scala 2.11 with scala-2.11 profile in >>>> master branch. >>>> > `mvn clean install -DskipTests -P \!scala-2.10,scala-2.11` command >>>> builds Flink with Scala 2.11. >>>> > >>>> > Regards, >>>> > Chiwan Park >>>> > >>>> > On Jun 10, 2015, at 9:56 PM, Flavio Pompermaier <pomperma...@okkam.it> >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > Nice! >>>> > >>>> > On 10 Jun 2015 14:49, "Philipp Goetze" <philipp.goe...@tu-ilmenau.de> >>>> wrote: >>>> > Hi community! >>>> > >>>> > We started a new project called Piglet ( >>>> https://github.com/ksattler/piglet). >>>> > For that we use i.a. Flink as a backend. The project is based on >>>> Scala 2.11. Thus we need a 2.11 build of Flink. >>>> > >>>> > Until now we used the 2.11 branch of the stratosphere project and >>>> built Flink ourselves. Unfortunately this branch is not up-to-date. >>>> > >>>> > Do you have an official repository for Flink 0.9 (built with Scala >>>> 2.11)? >>>> > >>>> > Best Regards, >>>> > Philipp >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>
