On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Artem Vovk <[email protected]> wrote: > I have already found a solution, for triggering i have used type > TriggerEvent.SIGNAL_EVENT with it, it doesn't work, but if I use > TriggerEvent.CALL_EVENT it works. In the description of TriggerEvent class I > have found : Specific event types have been defined in reference to SCXML, > where can I find this reference? <snip/>
The types above should not make any difference, they should really be treated as an implementation detail at this point (SIGNAL is recommended). A test case showing the difference in behavior above will be useful. > Which working draft was used for commons scxml? > <snap/> Commons SCXML v0.9 is closest (there are some missing pieces -- especially optional ones like anchor which were later removed) to this Working Draft: http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-scxml-20080516/ -Rahul > On Jun 18, 2011, at 6:53 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > >> On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Artem Vovk <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Is it a valid scxml expression in apache commons? >>> >> <snip/> >> >> If you mean transition, yes, target-less transitions are valid (a.k.a. >> stay transitions). >> >> >>> <transition event="internal" cond="_eventdata['name'] eq 'cancelclick'"> >>> <send event="'send_event'" targettype="'outside'" namelist="cancel" >>> /> >>> </transition> >>> >>> Because I trigger this event, but send does not works. >>> >> <snap/> >> >> You should see the EventDispatcher#send() call if the transition is >> indeed followed (event triggered and guard condition is true). >> >> -Rahul >> >> >>> >>> Cheers Artem >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
