Let me try to think how to better present my point. I'll try to get back in a few days.
On Mar 30, 2012, at 5:34 PM, Joe Baldwin wrote: > Andrus, > > I am pretty smart, but I have NO idea what you just said, :) I would really > like to understand your argument as it sounds like something that might be > important to my project. Do you have an analysis somewhere I read up on this? > > Thanks > Joe > > > On Mar 30, 2012, at 10:12 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > >> >> On Mar 30, 2012, at 5:01 PM, Durchholz, Joachim wrote: >> >>>> Thanks for explaining. If this is so, it sounds... unscalable. >>> >>> How so? >> >> You have to inflate your cache anew from DB in every transaction. You don't >> have any data when you start. >> >> However I don't think you are right in your assessment. Googling "Hibernate >> second level cache" shows that its scope goes beyond a single session. And >> hence my original question - how do they reconcile second level cache >> presence and the promise of 100% data consistency. My answer is that they >> don't. So their bigger argument about data consistency is moot. >> >> Andrus >> > >
